<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Good-Bye Q and Stanton</title>
	<atom:link href="http://waswatching.com/2005/06/30/good-bye-q-and-stanton/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://waswatching.com/2005/06/30/good-bye-q-and-stanton/</link>
	<description>Holy Cow! We never take cannoli from a huckleberry.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 22:40:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cliff</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2005/06/30/good-bye-q-and-stanton/comment-page-1/#comment-1033</link>
		<dc:creator>Cliff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2005 00:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.waswatching.com/?p=200#comment-1033</guid>
		<description>Also, Burnett doesn&#039;t have great numbers and Encarnacion is a stiff.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><input type="button" value="Reply" onclick="CF_Reply('Cliff');" /><input type="button" value="Quote" onclick="CF_Quote('co_1033','Cliff');" /></div><span id="co_1033"><p>Also, Burnett doesn&#8217;t have great numbers and Encarnacion is a stiff.</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phil</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2005/06/30/good-bye-q-and-stanton/comment-page-1/#comment-1032</link>
		<dc:creator>phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2005 20:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.waswatching.com/?p=200#comment-1032</guid>
		<description>I actually like the Sheff deal for Juan and Burnett...well- I like it better than the Cameron deal.

Burnett has great #&#039;s...but again- he&#039;s an NL pitcher....enough with NL pitchers already!!!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><input type="button" value="Reply" onclick="CF_Reply('phil');" /><input type="button" value="Quote" onclick="CF_Quote('co_1032','phil');" /></div><span id="co_1032"><p>I actually like the Sheff deal for Juan and Burnett&#8230;well- I like it better than the Cameron deal.</p>
<p>Burnett has great #&#8217;s&#8230;but again- he&#8217;s an NL pitcher&#8230;.enough with NL pitchers already!!!</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Lombardi</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2005/06/30/good-bye-q-and-stanton/comment-page-1/#comment-1031</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Lombardi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2005 18:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.waswatching.com/?p=200#comment-1031</guid>
		<description>I hope that Sheff to FLA rumor is just to run up the price for the O&#039;s and Sox.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><input type="button" value="Reply" onclick="CF_Reply('Steve Lombardi');" /><input type="button" value="Quote" onclick="CF_Quote('co_1031','Steve Lombardi');" /></div><span id="co_1031"><p>I hope that Sheff to FLA rumor is just to run up the price for the O&#8217;s and Sox.</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raf</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2005/06/30/good-bye-q-and-stanton/comment-page-1/#comment-1030</link>
		<dc:creator>Raf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2005 18:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.waswatching.com/?p=200#comment-1030</guid>
		<description>//As far as more effective, face it, the kids could have an ERA of five and a half and be more effective than Stanton and Q were this year.//

No doubt in my mind about that.  I&#039;m just saying, older or younger, they just need to be effective.

My p.o.v has always been that it doesn&#039;t make any sense to pay a &quot;proven veteran&quot; when you can get the same (if not more) from an &quot;untested rookie.&quot;  What&#039;s even better is that whomever gets the call (Anderson, Bean &amp; Proctor?) has the possiblity of maybe emerging into a setup/closer, at a fraction of the cost :D

Player Development rules!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><input type="button" value="Reply" onclick="CF_Reply('Raf');" /><input type="button" value="Quote" onclick="CF_Quote('co_1030','Raf');" /></div><span id="co_1030"><p>//As far as more effective, face it, the kids could have an ERA of five and a half and be more effective than Stanton and Q were this year.//</p>
<p>No doubt in my mind about that.  I&#8217;m just saying, older or younger, they just need to be effective.</p>
<p>My p.o.v has always been that it doesn&#8217;t make any sense to pay a &#8220;proven veteran&#8221; when you can get the same (if not more) from an &#8220;untested rookie.&#8221;  What&#8217;s even better is that whomever gets the call (Anderson, Bean &#038; Proctor?) has the possiblity of maybe emerging into a setup/closer, at a fraction of the cost <img src='http://waswatching.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Player Development rules!</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2005/06/30/good-bye-q-and-stanton/comment-page-1/#comment-1029</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2005 17:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.waswatching.com/?p=200#comment-1029</guid>
		<description>Another day, another rumor.

Sheffield to the Marlins for A. J. Burnett and Encarnacion.

http://www.palmbeachpost.com/marlins/content/sports/epaper/2005/06/30/w5c_marlnotes_0630.html

Frankly, after hearing Sheffield on Mike and the Mad Dog yesterday, I don&#039;t think teams will want to trade for him. But who knows.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><input type="button" value="Reply" onclick="CF_Reply('Don');" /><input type="button" value="Quote" onclick="CF_Quote('co_1029','Don');" /></div><span id="co_1029"><p>Another day, another rumor.</p>
<p>Sheffield to the Marlins for A. J. Burnett and Encarnacion.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.palmbeachpost.com/marlins/content/sports/epaper/2005/06/30/w5c_marlnotes_0630.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.palmbeachpost.com/marlins/content/sports/epaper/2005/06/30/w5c_marlnotes_0630.html</a></p>
<p>Frankly, after hearing Sheffield on Mike and the Mad Dog yesterday, I don&#8217;t think teams will want to trade for him. But who knows.</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Lombardi</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2005/06/30/good-bye-q-and-stanton/comment-page-1/#comment-1028</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Lombardi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2005 17:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.waswatching.com/?p=200#comment-1028</guid>
		<description>Looks like they were both DFA&#039;ed:  http://msnbc.msn.com/id/8417544/

As far as more effective, face it, the kids could have an ERA of five and a half and be more effective than Stanton and Q were this year.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><input type="button" value="Reply" onclick="CF_Reply('Steve Lombardi');" /><input type="button" value="Quote" onclick="CF_Quote('co_1028','Steve Lombardi');" /></div><span id="co_1028"><p>Looks like they were both DFA&#8217;ed:  <a href="http://msnbc.msn.com/id/8417544/" rel="nofollow">http://msnbc.msn.com/id/8417544/</a></p>
<p>As far as more effective, face it, the kids could have an ERA of five and a half and be more effective than Stanton and Q were this year.</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raf</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2005/06/30/good-bye-q-and-stanton/comment-page-1/#comment-1027</link>
		<dc:creator>Raf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2005 14:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.waswatching.com/?p=200#comment-1027</guid>
		<description>No need to get younger in the pen, they need to get more effective in the pen
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><input type="button" value="Reply" onclick="CF_Reply('Raf');" /><input type="button" value="Quote" onclick="CF_Quote('co_1027','Raf');" /></div><span id="co_1027"><p>No need to get younger in the pen, they need to get more effective in the pen</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

