Comments on: Beating The Angels http://waswatching.com/2005/10/02/beating-the-angels/ Holy Cow! We never take cannoli from a huckleberry. Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:11:57 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: rilkefan http://waswatching.com/2005/10/02/beating-the-angels/comment-page-1/#comment-3437 rilkefan Mon, 03 Oct 2005 20:08:31 +0000 http://wp.waswatching.com/?p=607#comment-3437 Seems like a pretty generic plan - starters go long, shut down their top three guys, your top three guys hit 0.400.

Seems like a pretty generic plan – starters go long, shut down their top three guys, your top three guys hit 0.400.

]]> By: Steve Lombardi http://waswatching.com/2005/10/02/beating-the-angels/comment-page-1/#comment-3436 Steve Lombardi Mon, 03 Oct 2005 14:14:27 +0000 http://wp.waswatching.com/?p=607#comment-3436 Thanks Raf - I'll correct that now.

Thanks Raf – I’ll correct that now.

]]> By: Raf http://waswatching.com/2005/10/02/beating-the-angels/comment-page-1/#comment-3435 Raf Mon, 03 Oct 2005 12:31:26 +0000 http://wp.waswatching.com/?p=607#comment-3435 But, more so, the key to the 2002 ALDS between the Angels and Sox was batting. ------------------------------ 2004, maybe? (: I agree with all your "keys." The wildcard will be Escobar. Angel pitching's tough enough, but it'll be interesting to see what role he'll play

But, more so, the key to the 2002 ALDS between the Angels and Sox was batting.
——————————
2004, maybe? (:

I agree with all your “keys.” The wildcard will be Escobar. Angel pitching’s tough enough, but it’ll be interesting to see what role he’ll play

]]>