~~~Wait to you get all the details Mr. Lombardi.~~~

Did I not include them? Did you skip this part:

~~~A member of the police department’s DUI squad pulled Swindal over at 2:12 a.m. after he cut the officer’s cruiser off in traffic, police spokesman Bill Proffitt said. “She had to brake and take evasive action to avoid hitting him,” Proffitt said. Swindal was weaving and driving 61 mph in a 35 mph zone when he was pulled over, Proffitt said.~~~

Doing 60 in a 35, weaving, and cutting off a cop is not a situation where a guy has two beers and then just gets himself in a bad spot.

Bottom line; if Swindal is above a .10 than I second your position. But wait until you know where he is at.

“Seriously, DUI is a terrible, terrible, crime. It’s inexcusable.”

Are you kidding me Steve? I work for a certain jx DA’s office in SoCal, and while it’s irresponsible and negligent, it is not a “terrible, terrible, crime”. It is a mistake many people make and while it is not excusable, your holier than thou statement makes you come off like an…never mind. Until you know what Swindal blew, or what his BAC was, don’t spout off. My good buddy received an DUI after we got back from Iraq, and it turned out that he blew a .06 and beat his charge. Wait to you get all the details Mr. Lombardi.

Maybe he got stopped pushing his scooter home while listening to Billy Ocean after two appletinis. OK, I watch too much Scrubs.