Comments on: To PSL Or Not To PSL At New Stadium? http://waswatching.com/2008/03/28/to-psl-or-not-to-psl-at-new-stadium/ Laconic Commentary From A Yankeeland Zealot Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:50:57 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Rich http://waswatching.com/2008/03/28/to-psl-or-not-to-psl-at-new-stadium/comment-page-1/#comment-28913 Rich Sat, 29 Mar 2008 01:13:20 +0000 http://wp.waswatching.com/?p=4683#comment-28913 Infrastructure should count because those improvements were probably a condition precedent to the project being approved.

Infrastructure should count because those improvements were probably a condition precedent to the project being approved.

]]> By: MJ http://waswatching.com/2008/03/28/to-psl-or-not-to-psl-at-new-stadium/comment-page-1/#comment-28912 MJ Fri, 28 Mar 2008 20:08:16 +0000 http://wp.waswatching.com/?p=4683#comment-28912 What worries me about this is that the Yanks (can't speak for the Mets) paid for their own stadium out of pocket, not including the public funds that were kicked in for infrastructure improvements in the area (Metro North, parking, etc.). So the Yanks COULD say, "well, for $1.3B, we should be able to sell PSL's if we want to..." The Cards probably don't rape and pillage their fans the way the Yanks do. It would really stink if we had to pay a PSL on top of what we already pay for our seats.

What worries me about this is that the Yanks (can’t speak for the Mets) paid for their own stadium out of pocket, not including the public funds that were kicked in for infrastructure improvements in the area (Metro North, parking, etc.). So the Yanks COULD say, “well, for $1.3B, we should be able to sell PSL’s if we want to…”

The Cards probably don’t rape and pillage their fans the way the Yanks do. It would really stink if we had to pay a PSL on top of what we already pay for our seats.

]]>