<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: April 29th vs. The Tigers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://waswatching.com/2008/04/29/april-29th-vs-the-tigers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://waswatching.com/2008/04/29/april-29th-vs-the-tigers/</link>
	<description>Holy Cow! We never take cannoli from a huckleberry.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 18:21:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Phil Hughes One Year Later - Vs. Tigers Again &#187; WasWatching.com</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2008/04/29/april-29th-vs-the-tigers/comment-page-1/#comment-180659</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Hughes One Year Later - Vs. Tigers Again &#187; WasWatching.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 12:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waswatching.com/?p=4910#comment-180659</guid>
		<description>[...] a flashback to some commentary on that game: Actually, what was most interesting about this game was listening to John Flaherty [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a flashback to some commentary on that game: Actually, what was most interesting about this game was listening to John Flaherty [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Lombardi</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2008/04/29/april-29th-vs-the-tigers/comment-page-1/#comment-29871</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Lombardi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 23:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waswatching.com/?p=4910#comment-29871</guid>
		<description>LOL Joel.

~~~WHY WAS OHLENDORF CROSSED UP TOO? ~~~

I&#039;m guessing it was a fluke - since Girardi and Hughes both went out of their way to say the other cross ups were Hughes&#039; fault...and that Phil cannot see the signs at night.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><input type="button" value="Reply" onclick="CF_Reply('Steve Lombardi');" /><input type="button" value="Quote" onclick="CF_Quote('co_29871','Steve Lombardi');" /></div><span id="co_29871"><p>LOL Joel.</p>
<p>~~~WHY WAS OHLENDORF CROSSED UP TOO? ~~~</p>
<p>I&#8217;m guessing it was a fluke &#8211; since Girardi and Hughes both went out of their way to say the other cross ups were Hughes&#8217; fault&#8230;and that Phil cannot see the signs at night.</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MJ</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2008/04/29/april-29th-vs-the-tigers/comment-page-1/#comment-29865</link>
		<dc:creator>MJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 20:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waswatching.com/?p=4910#comment-29865</guid>
		<description>Did Stewart have anything on his fingers to make them more visible?
==========================================
Yes, he had tape on his fingers and some sort of powdery white substance too.  YES did a closeup of his hand after the second cross-up.

I still want my question answered.  What&#039;s the rule on bringing back someone you&#039;ve DFA&#039;ed?  Moeller hasn&#039;t been picked up by anyone yet and I don&#039;t get why the team would roll the dice with Stewart?  Just send the poor, overmatched bastard back down to Scranton and bring Moeller back.

I can&#039;t believe it&#039;s come to me actually pining for Moeller...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><input type="button" value="Reply" onclick="CF_Reply('MJ');" /><input type="button" value="Quote" onclick="CF_Quote('co_29865','MJ');" /></div><span id="co_29865"><p>Did Stewart have anything on his fingers to make them more visible?<br />
==========================================<br />
Yes, he had tape on his fingers and some sort of powdery white substance too.  YES did a closeup of his hand after the second cross-up.</p>
<p>I still want my question answered.  What&#8217;s the rule on bringing back someone you&#8217;ve DFA&#8217;ed?  Moeller hasn&#8217;t been picked up by anyone yet and I don&#8217;t get why the team would roll the dice with Stewart?  Just send the poor, overmatched bastard back down to Scranton and bring Moeller back.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t believe it&#8217;s come to me actually pining for Moeller&#8230;</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hopbitters</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2008/04/29/april-29th-vs-the-tigers/comment-page-1/#comment-29863</link>
		<dc:creator>hopbitters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 20:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waswatching.com/?p=4910#comment-29863</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t see the broadcast. Did Stewart have anything on his fingers to make them more visible? If not, why not? Hughes is far from the first pitcher to have this problem. Lots of catchers have used white tape or even nail polish over the years to make it easier to pick up signs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><input type="button" value="Reply" onclick="CF_Reply('hopbitters');" /><input type="button" value="Quote" onclick="CF_Quote('co_29863','hopbitters');" /></div><span id="co_29863"><p>I didn&#8217;t see the broadcast. Did Stewart have anything on his fingers to make them more visible? If not, why not? Hughes is far from the first pitcher to have this problem. Lots of catchers have used white tape or even nail polish over the years to make it easier to pick up signs.</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2008/04/29/april-29th-vs-the-tigers/comment-page-1/#comment-29857</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 18:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waswatching.com/?p=4910#comment-29857</guid>
		<description>Now poor Chris Stewart is the fall guy for the Hughes apologists.  Great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><input type="button" value="Reply" onclick="CF_Reply('Joel');" /><input type="button" value="Quote" onclick="CF_Quote('co_29857','Joel');" /></div><span id="co_29857"><p>Now poor Chris Stewart is the fall guy for the Hughes apologists.  Great.</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: baileywalk</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2008/04/29/april-29th-vs-the-tigers/comment-page-1/#comment-29853</link>
		<dc:creator>baileywalk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 17:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waswatching.com/?p=4910#comment-29853</guid>
		<description>...over this Stewart P.O.S.
--

Amen to that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><input type="button" value="Reply" onclick="CF_Reply('baileywalk');" /><input type="button" value="Quote" onclick="CF_Quote('co_29853','baileywalk');" /></div><span id="co_29853"><p>&#8230;over this Stewart P.O.S.<br />
&#8211;</p>
<p>Amen to that.</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: baileywalk</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2008/04/29/april-29th-vs-the-tigers/comment-page-1/#comment-29852</link>
		<dc:creator>baileywalk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 17:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waswatching.com/?p=4910#comment-29852</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s fine.  BUT IF IT WAS ONLY HUGHES, THEN WHY WAS OHLENDORF CROSSED UP TOO?  Answer that.  It&#039;s the same catcher with two different pitchers and he&#039;s crossing them both up with no one on base.  It can&#039;t merely be a coincidence.

Does this mean that Ohlendorf can&#039;t see signs at night either?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><input type="button" value="Reply" onclick="CF_Reply('baileywalk');" /><input type="button" value="Quote" onclick="CF_Quote('co_29852','baileywalk');" /></div><span id="co_29852"><p>That&#8217;s fine.  BUT IF IT WAS ONLY HUGHES, THEN WHY WAS OHLENDORF CROSSED UP TOO?  Answer that.  It&#8217;s the same catcher with two different pitchers and he&#8217;s crossing them both up with no one on base.  It can&#8217;t merely be a coincidence.</p>
<p>Does this mean that Ohlendorf can&#8217;t see signs at night either?</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MJ</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2008/04/29/april-29th-vs-the-tigers/comment-page-1/#comment-29849</link>
		<dc:creator>MJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 17:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waswatching.com/?p=4910#comment-29849</guid>
		<description>A question regarding the catching situation:

According to MLB.com&#039;s transaction register (http://mlb.mlb.com/mlb/transactions/index.jsp) there have been no further transactions involving Chad Moeller.  What is the rule about DFA&#039;ing someone and then bringing them back?  If he&#039;s still not claimed, are the Yanks not able to bring him back to the team?  Whatever Moeller isn&#039;t, he&#039;s certainly better than Stewart.

I don&#039;t care if it was Hughes&#039;s fault, Ohlendorf&#039;s fault, or Stewart&#039;s fault last night, he&#039;s just not worth keeping around.  Moeller played acceptably and that should give him the benefit of the doubt over this Stewart P.O.S.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><input type="button" value="Reply" onclick="CF_Reply('MJ');" /><input type="button" value="Quote" onclick="CF_Quote('co_29849','MJ');" /></div><span id="co_29849"><p>A question regarding the catching situation:</p>
<p>According to MLB.com&#8217;s transaction register (<a href="http://mlb.mlb.com/mlb/transactions/index.jsp" rel="nofollow">http://mlb.mlb.com/mlb/transactions/index.jsp</a>) there have been no further transactions involving Chad Moeller.  What is the rule about DFA&#8217;ing someone and then bringing them back?  If he&#8217;s still not claimed, are the Yanks not able to bring him back to the team?  Whatever Moeller isn&#8217;t, he&#8217;s certainly better than Stewart.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t care if it was Hughes&#8217;s fault, Ohlendorf&#8217;s fault, or Stewart&#8217;s fault last night, he&#8217;s just not worth keeping around.  Moeller played acceptably and that should give him the benefit of the doubt over this Stewart P.O.S.</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Lombardi</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2008/04/29/april-29th-vs-the-tigers/comment-page-1/#comment-29842</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Lombardi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 16:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waswatching.com/?p=4910#comment-29842</guid>
		<description>baileywalk - maybe you should have your vision checked too? ;-)   Girardi - AND HUGHES HIMSELF - are saying the blame is on Hughes because he cannot see the signs at night.  And, yet, you want to blame the catcher.  Really?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><input type="button" value="Reply" onclick="CF_Reply('Steve Lombardi');" /><input type="button" value="Quote" onclick="CF_Quote('co_29842','Steve Lombardi');" /></div><span id="co_29842"><p>baileywalk &#8211; maybe you should have your vision checked too? <img src='http://waswatching.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />    Girardi &#8211; AND HUGHES HIMSELF &#8211; are saying the blame is on Hughes because he cannot see the signs at night.  And, yet, you want to blame the catcher.  Really?</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: baileywalk</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2008/04/29/april-29th-vs-the-tigers/comment-page-1/#comment-29836</link>
		<dc:creator>baileywalk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 16:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waswatching.com/?p=4910#comment-29836</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll repeat: I guess Ohlendorf has the same night-blindness then.  Because not only did he get crossed up too, but it was also while no one was on base.  If pitchers and catchers are getting crossed up while no one is on base, then the catcher is putting down signs in a way that the pitcher can&#039;t completely see all of his fingers.  That&#039;s the only plausible explanation -- and that&#039;s the catcher&#039;s fault.

And a second repeat: putting a young, struggling pitcher like Hughes with Stewart was just plain dumb.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><input type="button" value="Reply" onclick="CF_Reply('baileywalk');" /><input type="button" value="Quote" onclick="CF_Quote('co_29836','baileywalk');" /></div><span id="co_29836"><p>I&#8217;ll repeat: I guess Ohlendorf has the same night-blindness then.  Because not only did he get crossed up too, but it was also while no one was on base.  If pitchers and catchers are getting crossed up while no one is on base, then the catcher is putting down signs in a way that the pitcher can&#8217;t completely see all of his fingers.  That&#8217;s the only plausible explanation &#8212; and that&#8217;s the catcher&#8217;s fault.</p>
<p>And a second repeat: putting a young, struggling pitcher like Hughes with Stewart was just plain dumb.</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
