<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: (Joseph) Scott Bittle</title>
	<atom:link href="http://waswatching.com/2008/06/05/joseph-scott-bittle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://waswatching.com/2008/06/05/joseph-scott-bittle/</link>
	<description>Holy Cow! We never take cannoli from a huckleberry.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:34:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Salfino: Yanks Have Hit-And-Miss Draft : WasWatching.com</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2008/06/05/joseph-scott-bittle/comment-page-1/#comment-32642</link>
		<dc:creator>Salfino: Yanks Have Hit-And-Miss Draft : WasWatching.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 01:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waswatching.com/?p=5181#comment-32642</guid>
		<description>[...] Gerrit Cole. However, he agrees with me that Jeremy Bleich was an overdraft. The scout also concurs with my opinion that Scott Bittle was an odd pick at # 3 - considering how he [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Gerrit Cole. However, he agrees with me that Jeremy Bleich was an overdraft. The scout also concurs with my opinion that Scott Bittle was an odd pick at # 3 &#8211; considering how he [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MJ</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2008/06/05/joseph-scott-bittle/comment-page-1/#comment-32189</link>
		<dc:creator>MJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 11:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waswatching.com/?p=5181#comment-32189</guid>
		<description>Anyone notice his 16 K/9 this year?  Never mind what protocol is on drafting middle relievers, the guy obviously has something working if he can strike out guys at such a ridiculous rate.  From everything I read, he gets it done with a cutter and a changeup.  That sounds like he&#039;s the lovechild of Mo and Trevor Hoffman.

Finally, as Baileywalk said, since none of us have likely even seen him pitch, let&#039;s let the scouts tell us what they think, rather than following protocol.  Maybe they&#039;re high on him for a good reason?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><input type="button" value="Reply" onclick="CF_Reply('MJ');" /><input type="button" value="Quote" onclick="CF_Quote('co_32189','MJ');" /></div><span id="co_32189"><p>Anyone notice his 16 K/9 this year?  Never mind what protocol is on drafting middle relievers, the guy obviously has something working if he can strike out guys at such a ridiculous rate.  From everything I read, he gets it done with a cutter and a changeup.  That sounds like he&#8217;s the lovechild of Mo and Trevor Hoffman.</p>
<p>Finally, as Baileywalk said, since none of us have likely even seen him pitch, let&#8217;s let the scouts tell us what they think, rather than following protocol.  Maybe they&#8217;re high on him for a good reason?</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: baileywalk</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2008/06/05/joseph-scott-bittle/comment-page-1/#comment-32146</link>
		<dc:creator>baileywalk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 04:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waswatching.com/?p=5181#comment-32146</guid>
		<description>What I was politely trying to say was: how can you argue for or against players you have not seen, especially when the argument is against a group of people who have scouted said players for months and in some cases years?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><input type="button" value="Reply" onclick="CF_Reply('baileywalk');" /><input type="button" value="Quote" onclick="CF_Quote('co_32146','baileywalk');" /></div><span id="co_32146"><p>What I was politely trying to say was: how can you argue for or against players you have not seen, especially when the argument is against a group of people who have scouted said players for months and in some cases years?</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zack</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2008/06/05/joseph-scott-bittle/comment-page-1/#comment-32144</link>
		<dc:creator>Zack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 03:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waswatching.com/?p=5181#comment-32144</guid>
		<description>&quot;You don’t draft middle relievers with your 3rd pick in the draft. Middle guys are like second baseman - they develop internally, being moved from other roles. I have nothing against the Yankees drafting this guy - but, not with the 3rd pick.&quot;

Says who? In a draft where you have already selected a guy who projects as a future #1 or closer but has a long road ahead, and coming after a draft where you picked similar players, a guy who can make an almost immediate impact exactly where the Yankees need that, is exactly who you DO draft. There were a lot of guys rated above Joba where he was drafted too, doesn&#039;t mean they shouldn&#039;t have taken him there.

You are treating the 3rd round of baseball as if its the 1st, and yet, there were a whole bunch of relievers taken in the 1st round too...


Maybe YOU don&#039;t take him there, but a guy with those #s, a major league ready plus plus pitch, and someone they already coveted, you don&#039;t pass on...

Sure, the Yankees may have tried to look &quot;smarter&quot; than everyone else, but you CERTAINLY are trying to look smarter than them with your &quot;alternatives...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><input type="button" value="Reply" onclick="CF_Reply('Zack');" /><input type="button" value="Quote" onclick="CF_Quote('co_32144','Zack');" /></div><span id="co_32144"><p>&#8220;You don’t draft middle relievers with your 3rd pick in the draft. Middle guys are like second baseman &#8211; they develop internally, being moved from other roles. I have nothing against the Yankees drafting this guy &#8211; but, not with the 3rd pick.&#8221;</p>
<p>Says who? In a draft where you have already selected a guy who projects as a future #1 or closer but has a long road ahead, and coming after a draft where you picked similar players, a guy who can make an almost immediate impact exactly where the Yankees need that, is exactly who you DO draft. There were a lot of guys rated above Joba where he was drafted too, doesn&#8217;t mean they shouldn&#8217;t have taken him there.</p>
<p>You are treating the 3rd round of baseball as if its the 1st, and yet, there were a whole bunch of relievers taken in the 1st round too&#8230;</p>
<p>Maybe YOU don&#8217;t take him there, but a guy with those #s, a major league ready plus plus pitch, and someone they already coveted, you don&#8217;t pass on&#8230;</p>
<p>Sure, the Yankees may have tried to look &#8220;smarter&#8221; than everyone else, but you CERTAINLY are trying to look smarter than them with your &#8220;alternatives&#8230;&#8221;</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Lombardi</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2008/06/05/joseph-scott-bittle/comment-page-1/#comment-32141</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Lombardi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 03:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waswatching.com/?p=5181#comment-32141</guid>
		<description>~~This is one aspect of baseball where you really need to leave it to the experts.~~

That&#039;s fine.  And, the &quot;experts&quot; at Baseball America had Brittle as the 97th best prospect in the draft - which means there were 22 guys better than him, in theory, for the 75th pick in the draft...where the Yankees took him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><input type="button" value="Reply" onclick="CF_Reply('Steve Lombardi');" /><input type="button" value="Quote" onclick="CF_Quote('co_32141','Steve Lombardi');" /></div><span id="co_32141"><p>~~This is one aspect of baseball where you really need to leave it to the experts.~~</p>
<p>That&#8217;s fine.  And, the &#8220;experts&#8221; at Baseball America had Brittle as the 97th best prospect in the draft &#8211; which means there were 22 guys better than him, in theory, for the 75th pick in the draft&#8230;where the Yankees took him.</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Lombardi</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2008/06/05/joseph-scott-bittle/comment-page-1/#comment-32140</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Lombardi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 03:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waswatching.com/?p=5181#comment-32140</guid>
		<description>~~~~Read that BA report again and look at his #s, tell me where you see anything that says he won’t be anything but successful.~~~~

&quot;At 6-foot-1, 212 pounds, and without an above-average fastball, Bittle does not fit the typical closer’s profile in the major leagues. He will most likely be a long relief or setup man in the pros.&quot;

You don&#039;t draft middle relievers with your 3rd pick in the draft.  Middle guys are like second baseman - they develop internally, being moved from other roles.  I have nothing against the Yankees drafting this guy - but, not with the 3rd pick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><input type="button" value="Reply" onclick="CF_Reply('Steve Lombardi');" /><input type="button" value="Quote" onclick="CF_Quote('co_32140','Steve Lombardi');" /></div><span id="co_32140"><p>~~~~Read that BA report again and look at his #s, tell me where you see anything that says he won’t be anything but successful.~~~~</p>
<p>&#8220;At 6-foot-1, 212 pounds, and without an above-average fastball, Bittle does not fit the typical closer’s profile in the major leagues. He will most likely be a long relief or setup man in the pros.&#8221;</p>
<p>You don&#8217;t draft middle relievers with your 3rd pick in the draft.  Middle guys are like second baseman &#8211; they develop internally, being moved from other roles.  I have nothing against the Yankees drafting this guy &#8211; but, not with the 3rd pick.</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: baileywalk</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2008/06/05/joseph-scott-bittle/comment-page-1/#comment-32135</link>
		<dc:creator>baileywalk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 02:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waswatching.com/?p=5181#comment-32135</guid>
		<description>Yeah, no offense... and I&#039;m sure you&#039;ll think I&#039;m saying this because I don&#039;t like you or something or to be a contrarian... but when it comes to the baseball draft, the fan knows little to nothing about these guys (especially the post-first-rounders) and their opinions are usually meaningless.  I say that about you, me, and just about everyone else.  The Yankees know more about these players than we ever could.  If they drafted them, then they scouted them extensively.  I&#039;m betting you&#039;ve never seen these kids play.  There&#039;s a lot more to drafting players than reading a few scouting reports.

Again -- I say this for EVERYONE.  Not just you.  Arguing draft picks with a team -- especially one who has found gems the last few years -- is highly ridiculous.

Really -- who knew who Ian Kennedy was?  Who knew who Zach McAllister was?  Hughes wasn&#039;t even that well known.

This is one aspect of baseball where you really need to leave it to the experts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><input type="button" value="Reply" onclick="CF_Reply('baileywalk');" /><input type="button" value="Quote" onclick="CF_Quote('co_32135','baileywalk');" /></div><span id="co_32135"><p>Yeah, no offense&#8230; and I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ll think I&#8217;m saying this because I don&#8217;t like you or something or to be a contrarian&#8230; but when it comes to the baseball draft, the fan knows little to nothing about these guys (especially the post-first-rounders) and their opinions are usually meaningless.  I say that about you, me, and just about everyone else.  The Yankees know more about these players than we ever could.  If they drafted them, then they scouted them extensively.  I&#8217;m betting you&#8217;ve never seen these kids play.  There&#8217;s a lot more to drafting players than reading a few scouting reports.</p>
<p>Again &#8212; I say this for EVERYONE.  Not just you.  Arguing draft picks with a team &#8212; especially one who has found gems the last few years &#8212; is highly ridiculous.</p>
<p>Really &#8212; who knew who Ian Kennedy was?  Who knew who Zach McAllister was?  Hughes wasn&#8217;t even that well known.</p>
<p>This is one aspect of baseball where you really need to leave it to the experts.</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zack</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2008/06/05/joseph-scott-bittle/comment-page-1/#comment-32131</link>
		<dc:creator>Zack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 01:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waswatching.com/?p=5181#comment-32131</guid>
		<description>Are you nuts? This is a guy they already wanted, who can have an immediate impact, and has one of the best pitches in the draft. It&#039;s got nothing to do with being &quot;smarter&quot; or anything, its that this is the guy they wanted. Period. This is a guy who is easily projectable as a setup guy, and the nothing that he doesn&#039;t have anything in his favor is ridiculous. Read that BA report again and look at his #s, tell me where you see anything that says he won&#039;t be anything but successful.

Its okay to take issue with the picks, but offering &quot;your guys&quot; based on what you have read and then trying to claim the Yanks are being cute is just silly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><input type="button" value="Reply" onclick="CF_Reply('Zack');" /><input type="button" value="Quote" onclick="CF_Quote('co_32131','Zack');" /></div><span id="co_32131"><p>Are you nuts? This is a guy they already wanted, who can have an immediate impact, and has one of the best pitches in the draft. It&#8217;s got nothing to do with being &#8220;smarter&#8221; or anything, its that this is the guy they wanted. Period. This is a guy who is easily projectable as a setup guy, and the nothing that he doesn&#8217;t have anything in his favor is ridiculous. Read that BA report again and look at his #s, tell me where you see anything that says he won&#8217;t be anything but successful.</p>
<p>Its okay to take issue with the picks, but offering &#8220;your guys&#8221; based on what you have read and then trying to claim the Yanks are being cute is just silly.</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

