<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brett Gardner Called-Up?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://waswatching.com/2008/06/30/brett-gardner-called-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://waswatching.com/2008/06/30/brett-gardner-called-up/</link>
	<description>Laconic Commentary From A Yankeeland Zealot</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 12:07:40 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Raf</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2008/06/30/brett-gardner-called-up/comment-page-1/#comment-34678</link>
		<dc:creator>Raf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 15:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waswatching.com/?p=5324#comment-34678</guid>
		<description>This team needs to get back to what worked 1996-2001.
---------------
They better get to work on the pitching staff then.  Maybe shore up the defense a bit too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><input type="button" value="Reply" onclick="CF_Reply('Raf');" /><input type="button" value="Quote" onclick="CF_Quote('co_34678','Raf');" /></div><span id="co_34678"><p>This team needs to get back to what worked 1996-2001.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
They better get to work on the pitching staff then.  Maybe shore up the defense a bit too.</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: baileywalk</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2008/06/30/brett-gardner-called-up/comment-page-1/#comment-34528</link>
		<dc:creator>baileywalk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 16:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waswatching.com/?p=5324#comment-34528</guid>
		<description>We might have to consult Google on this one, but Steve may not have been the first to call for Gardner to be on the big-league team... two days ago.  Um, just a guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><input type="button" value="Reply" onclick="CF_Reply('baileywalk');" /><input type="button" value="Quote" onclick="CF_Quote('co_34528','baileywalk');" /></div><span id="co_34528"><p>We might have to consult Google on this one, but Steve may not have been the first to call for Gardner to be on the big-league team&#8230; two days ago.  Um, just a guess.</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2008/06/30/brett-gardner-called-up/comment-page-1/#comment-34468</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 23:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waswatching.com/?p=5324#comment-34468</guid>
		<description>Ellsbury as of now has an OPS+ of 94. The HoF must wait.

Gardner has improved his OBP as he has risen through the minors. He struggles early on in a  new league, so it will not surprise if he struggles early on in ML ball. 

This team needs to get back to what worked 1996-2001. Gardner might be part of that. Just play him, give him Melky time, that is as much a  shot as Melky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><input type="button" value="Reply" onclick="CF_Reply('Don');" /><input type="button" value="Quote" onclick="CF_Quote('co_34468','Don');" /></div><span id="co_34468"><p>Ellsbury as of now has an OPS+ of 94. The HoF must wait.</p>
<p>Gardner has improved his OBP as he has risen through the minors. He struggles early on in a  new league, so it will not surprise if he struggles early on in ML ball. </p>
<p>This team needs to get back to what worked 1996-2001. Gardner might be part of that. Just play him, give him Melky time, that is as much a  shot as Melky.</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2008/06/30/brett-gardner-called-up/comment-page-1/#comment-34454</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 20:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waswatching.com/?p=5324#comment-34454</guid>
		<description>Only two days ago?  I&#039;ve been thinking it for about a month now, mostly because of the boxscores posted at RAB.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><input type="button" value="Reply" onclick="CF_Reply('Pete');" /><input type="button" value="Quote" onclick="CF_Quote('co_34454','Pete');" /></div><span id="co_34454"><p>Only two days ago?  I&#8217;ve been thinking it for about a month now, mostly because of the boxscores posted at RAB.</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TurnTwo</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2008/06/30/brett-gardner-called-up/comment-page-1/#comment-34423</link>
		<dc:creator>TurnTwo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 15:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waswatching.com/?p=5324#comment-34423</guid>
		<description>&quot;Didn’t the Twins want Melky as a part of any deal for Santana?&quot;

that was moreso primarily because with Huinter gone, they needed someone in return who could play the position than they viewed him that highly (but i could be wrong).

from what was reported, seemed like the Twins either wanted Phil Hughes, or who have taken Wang and IPK... all the other moving parts to potential trades were secondary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><input type="button" value="Reply" onclick="CF_Reply('TurnTwo');" /><input type="button" value="Quote" onclick="CF_Quote('co_34423','TurnTwo');" /></div><span id="co_34423"><p>&#8220;Didn’t the Twins want Melky as a part of any deal for Santana?&#8221;</p>
<p>that was moreso primarily because with Huinter gone, they needed someone in return who could play the position than they viewed him that highly (but i could be wrong).</p>
<p>from what was reported, seemed like the Twins either wanted Phil Hughes, or who have taken Wang and IPK&#8230; all the other moving parts to potential trades were secondary.</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OnceIWasAYankeeFan</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2008/06/30/brett-gardner-called-up/comment-page-1/#comment-34422</link>
		<dc:creator>OnceIWasAYankeeFan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 15:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waswatching.com/?p=5324#comment-34422</guid>
		<description>~~does Melky get moved in the offseason?~~

Dunno. He adds a lot of value as a 4th OF - plus, he’s cheap.

_____________________

The thing is that some teams value cheapness to the point that he&#039;s a starter, and valued accordingly.  Didn&#039;t the Twins want Melky as a part of any deal for Santana?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><input type="button" value="Reply" onclick="CF_Reply('OnceIWasAYankeeFan');" /><input type="button" value="Quote" onclick="CF_Quote('co_34422','OnceIWasAYankeeFan');" /></div><span id="co_34422"><p>~~does Melky get moved in the offseason?~~</p>
<p>Dunno. He adds a lot of value as a 4th OF &#8211; plus, he’s cheap.</p>
<p>_____________________</p>
<p>The thing is that some teams value cheapness to the point that he&#8217;s a starter, and valued accordingly.  Didn&#8217;t the Twins want Melky as a part of any deal for Santana?</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TurnTwo</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2008/06/30/brett-gardner-called-up/comment-page-1/#comment-34421</link>
		<dc:creator>TurnTwo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 15:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waswatching.com/?p=5324#comment-34421</guid>
		<description>yeah, i think people need to relax with the Gardner/Ellsbury comparisons. 

just let him go out and play games, and play within his own game. he&#039;s done a pretty good job of it so far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><input type="button" value="Reply" onclick="CF_Reply('TurnTwo');" /><input type="button" value="Quote" onclick="CF_Quote('co_34421','TurnTwo');" /></div><span id="co_34421"><p>yeah, i think people need to relax with the Gardner/Ellsbury comparisons. </p>
<p>just let him go out and play games, and play within his own game. he&#8217;s done a pretty good job of it so far.</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Lombardi</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2008/06/30/brett-gardner-called-up/comment-page-1/#comment-34420</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Lombardi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 15:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waswatching.com/?p=5324#comment-34420</guid>
		<description>~~does Melky get moved in the offseason?~~

Dunno.  He adds a lot of value as a 4th OF - plus, he&#039;s cheap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><input type="button" value="Reply" onclick="CF_Reply('Steve Lombardi');" /><input type="button" value="Quote" onclick="CF_Quote('co_34420','Steve Lombardi');" /></div><span id="co_34420"><p>~~does Melky get moved in the offseason?~~</p>
<p>Dunno.  He adds a lot of value as a 4th OF &#8211; plus, he&#8217;s cheap.</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TurnTwo</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2008/06/30/brett-gardner-called-up/comment-page-1/#comment-34419</link>
		<dc:creator>TurnTwo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 15:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waswatching.com/?p=5324#comment-34419</guid>
		<description>&quot;Especially if Girardi bats him lead-off just because he’s speedy.&quot;

i dont think he&#039;ll bat abywhere but the 9 hole, myself. he&#039;s perfect for the role, because he can either get himself on base and in scoring position for the bats at the top, or bunt/move runners into scoring position for Damon, Jeter, Abre, and company.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><input type="button" value="Reply" onclick="CF_Reply('TurnTwo');" /><input type="button" value="Quote" onclick="CF_Quote('co_34419','TurnTwo');" /></div><span id="co_34419"><p>&#8220;Especially if Girardi bats him lead-off just because he’s speedy.&#8221;</p>
<p>i dont think he&#8217;ll bat abywhere but the 9 hole, myself. he&#8217;s perfect for the role, because he can either get himself on base and in scoring position for the bats at the top, or bunt/move runners into scoring position for Damon, Jeter, Abre, and company.</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Lombardi</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2008/06/30/brett-gardner-called-up/comment-page-1/#comment-34418</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Lombardi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 15:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waswatching.com/?p=5324#comment-34418</guid>
		<description>For the record, what I was saying about Gardner and Ellsbury - last November:

http://tinyurl.com/5b5l8a</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><input type="button" value="Reply" onclick="CF_Reply('Steve Lombardi');" /><input type="button" value="Quote" onclick="CF_Quote('co_34418','Steve Lombardi');" /></div><span id="co_34418"><p>For the record, what I was saying about Gardner and Ellsbury &#8211; last November:</p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/5b5l8a" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/5b5l8a</a></p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
