A-Rod & Giambi Become Pop-Guns In Big Spot?
In an attempt to find some reasons why the Yankees have issues scoring runs this season - when they’re not facing the Mariners or Astros - I decided to look at how New York has done, this season, to date, in terms of “slugging” in High Leverage game situations.
Via Baseball-Reference.com, here are the American League team leaders in Slugging Percentage in High Leverage situations - through last night:
TEAM G PA SLG BOS 86 705 .470 CHW 85 684 .449 LAA 85 653 .446 BAL 87 720 .438 TEX 85 719 .427 DET 89 705 .426 MIN 88 738 .419 TBR 87 691 .418 NYY 88 675 .413 OAK 88 767 .408 KCR 89 617 .389 TOR 86 796 .382 CLE 83 655 .377 SEA 84 721 .324
Interesting, huh? Some teams that are doing well in the standings - like the Red Sox, White Sox, and Angels - rank high here. And, some teams that are not doing well in the standings - line the Blue Jays, Indians, and Mariners - don’t rank high here. (What about the Rays here? I suppose that it says they’re doing it this season on pitching, no?)
These rankings suggest that there’s something to be said about good teams slugging well in High Leverage situations. And, the Yankees mark of .413 is not very good in this department. So, who on the Yankees team is leading the way towards this poor standing? Via Baseball-Reference.com, here are the Yankees leaders in Slugging Percentage in High Leverage situations - through last night:
BATTER PA SLG Posada 45 .541 Matsui 49 .523 Abreu 66 .500 Moeller 10 .500 Damon 52 .468 Jeter 56 .457 Giambi 77 .422 Rodrigz 65 .418 Cabrera 78 .406 Duncan 19 .353 Ensberg 13 .333 Molina 41 .314 Cano 64 .288 Betemit 17 .286 Gonzalz 8 .167 Gardner 8 .167 Christn 3 .000
Hmm…this list suggests that guys like Posada, Matsui, Abreu, Damon, and, to an extent, Jeter, have been coming through with the “big” (meaning extra base) hit for the Yankees, so far, this season during a big spot in a ballgame.
However, note the marks here for Giambi (.422) and A-Rod (.418). These suggest that, in a big spot, this season, these two “sluggers” are not swinging a big stick…and they are performing more like punch-and-judy hitters.
Taking this all in, is it a reach to suggest that…for the Yankees to score more runs, and win more games, and do better in the standings, Jason Giambi and Alex Rodriguez need to start driving the ball for extra bases where it counts (in terms of crucial game situations)?
Hey, at this point, if they started doing it…it couldn’t hurt, could it?
Comments
15 Responses to “A-Rod & Giambi Become Pop-Guns In Big Spot?”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.





[...] … When in doubt try another lineup. Turns out they still have Chad Moeller. Who knew? … Steve Lombardi of Was Watching has some interesting stats that reveal the tendencies of A-Rod and Jason [...]
Slugging Percentage is nice, but a few more plain old singles with RISP would be enough.
But, are the Yankees paying A-Rod and Giambi to hit singles?
I know you love to do these kinds of lists, but maybe some complete research would further inform your readers.
You know what the Yankees are slugging in ALL situations? .413, which is EXACTLY what they would be expected to hit in high-leverage situations, in low-leverage situations, and in every single possible situation you can come up with.
And next time you’re trying to prove a point, don’t isolate 20% of a players plate appearances and claim that it means something. Richie Sexson has as many PA’s versus lefties as Giambi does in High Leverage situations. I don’t see anyone claiming that Sexson’s split is meaningful– look at his career vs. lefties.
Perhaps not. But when A-Rod is at bat with RISP and the game on the line, trying to take a low outside pitch and pulling to left field is not getting it done. Seems like he is just hitting for HRs now. Giambino is similar.
Swinging for contact and going to the opposite field is what the team needs from these guys, and with their strength, contact results in extra base hits.
Just my 2c.
So, I guess the 2 run single he just hit doesnt count according to you, huh
Another reminder why I don’t read this site on a regular basis ( linked by Baseball Think Factory- a real baseball site )
Clown
And now a HR
Your timing is impeccable, LOL
Steve, can you help Peter Abraham out and put together an article about how often managers change their lineups? Maybe make some points about the problems Girardi has faced with all the injuries too.
Since he deletes any posts questioning this subject from his blog I’m hoping that maybe, just maybe, one of his peers can show him why these criticisms are so obtuse. At the very least his loyal readers will benefit from intelligent baseball analysis.
Thank you
Bologma!
sad day today , bobby murser RIP
Sheesh Corey, at least spell the guy’s name right on the day he died. MURCER! My favorite player as a kid, one heck of a good guy according to everyone associated with the game. He will be missed.
~~Clown~~
ieddyi - how am I supposed to respect your opinion when you call me names?
~~You know what the Yankees are slugging in ALL situations? .413, which is EXACTLY what they would be expected to hit in high-leverage situations, in low-leverage situations, and in every single possible situation you can come up with. ~~
It’s not .413 in all situations. It’s .413 overall.
In High Leverage spots it’s .413
In Medium Leverage spots it’s .388
In Low Leverage spots it’s .438
To me, this suggests that the Yankees slug better when nothing is one the line, no?
Are these numbers significantly different from last year’s team performance? Are these numbers significantly off these players’ career norms? What’s a “good” slugging percentage in a high leverage situation? What’s an average slugging percentage? Is it just the Yankees who slug better when “nothing is one [sic] the line,” or is it all teams? Isn’t it *good* that the Yankees slug better in *high* leverage situations than *medium* leverage situation?
Basically, Steve, whenever you start a post, “I thought I’d take a look at …,” you should stop yourself and think about whether you’re fully evaluating the sitation.
For example, you do not need to post that you’ve observed that Mike Mussina is unhittable in the 8th inning, and conclude that the Yankees should do whatever they can to work with Mussina to minimize his pitch counts so that he can get to the 8th inning, where he is statistically unhittable.
While this is (I hope) a silly example, you generally draw similar conclusions from small sample sizes, and you wind up missing the bigger picture. I can remember reading some ridiculous post of yours last season or the season before where you had identified that Wang had a particularly bad ERA in the 4th inning, or something like that, and that if we could just get Want through the 4th inning …. (complete nonsense!)
Moose isn’t unhittable in the 8th inning because Moose is unhittable in the 8th inning. Moose is unhittable in the 8th inning because he NEVER GETS TO the 8th inning, and on those rare occasions when Moose does reach the 8th inning, it’s in games in which he is really dealing. So, of course he seems unhittable in the 8th inning.
If the opposing teams bring in their best relief pitchers against the Yankees’ acclaimed sluggers, and our sluggers only manage singles instead of doubles and HRs against these great pitchers, I’m not going to conclude that our sluggers can’t slug.
Hey, I’m not saying that the Yankees sluggers, Alex and Jason, can’t slug - because their homer totals, etc., show that they can.
I’m just saying that THE STATS SHOW that they are not slugging near their career norms - or near what their teammates are slugging…IN HIGH LEVERAGE SITUATIONS.
And, that RP theory doesn’t fly. High Leverage spots can happen anywhere in a game. It doesn’t have to be late in a game with a RP on the mound. It could happen in the 3rd inning too. Each game, and case, is different as to when the High Leverage situation occurs…it depends on the inning, the score, runners on base, the outs…lots of things.