• A-Rod’s Clutch Stats Beg For Nady To Bat 5th?

    Posted by on August 4th, 2008 · Comments (12)

    I’ve pulled together the following BA/OBP/SLG stats for Alex Rodriguez, as a Yankee, in “clutch” situations, via Baseball-Reference.com, with the 2008 stats being through yesterday’s game:

    		PA	BA	OBP	SLG	YEAR
    2 outs, RISP	61	.227	.443	.432	2008
    2 outs, RISP	105	.318	.448	.776	2007
    2 outs, RISP	109	.313	.495	.475	2006
    2 outs, RISP	105	.302	.429	.512	2005
    2 outs, RISP	78	.206	.308	.456	2004
    
    		PA	BA	OBP	SLG	YEAR
    Late & Close	54	.222	.352	.356	2008
    Late & Close	82	.357	.439	.686	2007
    Late & Close	89	.237	.326	.368	2006
    Late & Close	91	.293	.418	.520	2005
    Late & Close	92	.275	.359	.438	2004
    
    		PA	BA	OBP	SLG	YEAR
    Tie Game		128	.264	.359	.464	2008
    Tie Game		198	.276	.399	.577	2007
    Tie Game		180	.227	.350	.440	2006
    Tie Game		174	.336	.448	.706	2005
    Tie Game		193	.270	.415	.474	2004
    
    		PA	BA	OBP	SLG	YEAR
    Within 1 R	216	.280	.384	.473	2008
    Within 1 R	344	.316	.419	.684	2007
    Within 1 R	330	.267	.382	.469	2006
    Within 1 R	333	.330	.441	.659	2005
    Within 1 R	356	.300	.404	.545	2004
    
    		PA	BA	OBP	SLG	YEAR
    Within 2 R	274	.294	.398	.498	2008
    Within 2 R	447	.332	.436	.698	2007
    Within 2 R	451	.261	.375	.455	2006
    Within 2 R	452	.316	.431	.591	2005
    Within 2 R	465	.298	.385	.510	2004
    
    		PA	BA	OBP	SLG	YEAR
    Within 3 R	312	.306	.397	.541	2008
    Within 3 R	529	.332	.437	.666	2007
    Within 3 R	523	.269	.377	.479	2006
    Within 3 R	533	.319	.424	.607	2005
    Within 3 R	551	.289	.383	.512	2004
    

    As you can see, when it comes to batting with RISP and 2 outs, as a Yankee, A-Rod is usually a .300 hitter – sans this season and his first year (2004) in New York. But, whereas Alex was a poor hitter with RISP and 2 outs in 2004, this season Rodriguez has a high OBP with RISP and 2 outs. That says something about his ability to not go outside the strike-zone…and about the person batting behind him in the line-up.

    In terms of “Late & Close” situations, Alex stinks there this season. But, then again, outside of his Yankees MVP seasons of 2005 and 2007, he’s never been outstanding in this department.

    The other splits shown here, in terms of game score, are unremarkable in the sense that there’s not much swing…outside of A-Rod showing tremendous power during his Yankee MVP seasons when the score was “Within 3 Runs.”

    Since Jason Giambi bats fifth for the Yankees, most of the time, maybe that’s the key in terms of Alex getting more hits this season with RISP and 2 outs?

    In 60 PA this season, to date, with RISP and 2 outs, the “Big G” has the following BA/OBP/SLG line: .191/.367/.277 – So, basically, in these spots, Giambi walks or does nothing.

    I know that it’s hard to put to back-to-back right-hanged batters in the middle of your line-up. But, still, when you look at these stats, you have to wonder if it makes sense to bat Xavier Nady after A-Rod in the line-up…at least while Giambi is not swinging a big stick.

    Post to Twitter

    Comments on A-Rod’s Clutch Stats Beg For Nady To Bat 5th?

    1. phishie
      August 4th, 2008 | 11:56 am

      Haha, listening to Max Kellerman this morning? Same exact discussion on that show.

    2. East Hill
      August 4th, 2008 | 12:10 pm

      Cano 5th, Nady 6th? Maybe Cano will remain hot/ perform better with hitters behind him. When Cano is good he is the 2nd best hitter on the team. But him in a spot he is less likely to see garbage, it may only help him and Alex.

    3. Raf
      August 4th, 2008 | 12:43 pm

      I know that it’s hard to put to back-to-back right-hanged batters in the middle of your line-up.
      ———-
      It’s been done before; Alex Rodriguez & Edgar Martinez (3-4) in Seattle.

    4. August 4th, 2008 | 1:29 pm

      phishie – actually, I had no idea…then again, maybe Max is reading WW?

      Good point Raf. Ruth and Gehrig were both LHB…and they batted BTB. When you’re good…you’re good.

    5. DJ21996
      August 4th, 2008 | 1:54 pm

      Alex just needs to shorten his swing in those spots. Too often his swing becomes of the home run variety which leads to failure.

      Hideki Matsui was so crucial for things like this. You could put him anyway and he would hit in big spots.

    6. antone
      August 4th, 2008 | 1:55 pm

      Max Kellerman clearly reads WW and saw my comment on Sunday’s game post that me and Steve want Nady 5th j/k

      I think they should do it because Giambi has been awful lately and if Nady and A-Rod are both hitting .330 then it’s not going to matter much if they righty/righty back to back.

      I guess the only issue would be Giambi and Cano back to back at 6 and 7 but you could always bat Pudge ahead of Cano or pinch hit Sexson or Betitmet for Giambi when a lefty comes in.

    7. Corey
      August 4th, 2008 | 8:11 pm

      has anyone ever thought about maybe pitchers are really buckeling down because its alex rodriguez up at bat in a big spot? I really doubt pitchers pitch a-rod the same way in big spots as they would any other hitter.

    8. August 4th, 2008 | 10:57 pm

      “buckeling down” and yet walking him 22% of the time?

    9. Corey
      August 5th, 2008 | 8:15 am

      thats just a case of walking someone when you don’t want to get beat by the best hitter in the game

    10. August 5th, 2008 | 9:25 am

      I thought that was the point of the post…
      If someone behind him in the line-up was hitting, teams would be forced to throw to him…

    11. Raf
      August 5th, 2008 | 4:11 pm

      I thought that was the point of the post…
      If someone behind him in the line-up was hitting, teams would be forced to throw to him…
      ————–
      Bonds still put up numbers despite having no one in the lineup to protect him.

      I believe it has been more or less proven that protection is a myth.

    12. August 7th, 2008 | 9:15 am

      [...] Rodriguez? He’s not having a season like he did last year. But, then again, he’s not in his option year again, is he? [wink] Still, he’s not terrible either – and would do better given some protection in the line-up. [...]

    Leave a reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.