<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Speaking Of Red Sox&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://waswatching.com/2008/08/26/speaking-of-red-sox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://waswatching.com/2008/08/26/speaking-of-red-sox/</link>
	<description>Holy Cow! We never take cannoli from a huckleberry.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 22:39:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Lombardi</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2008/08/26/speaking-of-red-sox/comment-page-1/#comment-42369</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Lombardi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 03:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waswatching.com/?p=6443#comment-42369</guid>
		<description>I can live with him being in the Top 5.  That&#039;s not chopped liver.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><input type="button" value="Reply" onclick="CF_Reply('Steve Lombardi');" /><input type="button" value="Quote" onclick="CF_Quote('co_42369','Steve Lombardi');" /></div><span id="co_42369"><p>I can live with him being in the Top 5.  That&#8217;s not chopped liver.</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hopbitters</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2008/08/26/speaking-of-red-sox/comment-page-1/#comment-42324</link>
		<dc:creator>hopbitters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 22:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waswatching.com/?p=6443#comment-42324</guid>
		<description>You don’t think taking 400 runners off base closes that gap of 700 RCAA?

-

No, I don&#039;t. And it isn&#039;t 400 to nothing. It&#039;s 449 to 204, for a difference of 245. If those 245 baserunners would have led to three runs each, that would almost cover the RCAA disparity, but I think that&#039;s really stretching things.

And I certainly don&#039;t mean this to diminish Speaker in any way. I think you might be able to argue him into the top 5 position players overall, but I don&#039;t think he gets past Cobb, (who wasn&#039;t that far behind Speaker in assists, btw, at 391).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><input type="button" value="Reply" onclick="CF_Reply('hopbitters');" /><input type="button" value="Quote" onclick="CF_Quote('co_42324','hopbitters');" /></div><span id="co_42324"><p>You don’t think taking 400 runners off base closes that gap of 700 RCAA?</p>
<p>-</p>
<p>No, I don&#8217;t. And it isn&#8217;t 400 to nothing. It&#8217;s 449 to 204, for a difference of 245. If those 245 baserunners would have led to three runs each, that would almost cover the RCAA disparity, but I think that&#8217;s really stretching things.</p>
<p>And I certainly don&#8217;t mean this to diminish Speaker in any way. I think you might be able to argue him into the top 5 position players overall, but I don&#8217;t think he gets past Cobb, (who wasn&#8217;t that far behind Speaker in assists, btw, at 391).</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Lombardi</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2008/08/26/speaking-of-red-sox/comment-page-1/#comment-42300</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Lombardi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 17:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waswatching.com/?p=6443#comment-42300</guid>
		<description>Interesting point there Tresh Fan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><input type="button" value="Reply" onclick="CF_Reply('Steve Lombardi');" /><input type="button" value="Quote" onclick="CF_Quote('co_42300','Steve Lombardi');" /></div><span id="co_42300"><p>Interesting point there Tresh Fan</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tresh Fan</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2008/08/26/speaking-of-red-sox/comment-page-1/#comment-42295</link>
		<dc:creator>Tresh Fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 16:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waswatching.com/?p=6443#comment-42295</guid>
		<description>RE: Speaker.

I always wondered why there was never a &quot;Curse of the Gray Eagle.&quot;  If you look at it, at the time of the Speaker deal the Red Sox were nearly invincible while the Indians were absolutely pathetic, averaging about 100 losses a year. Without Speaker in 1916 Boston still won the World Championship, but they scored about 100 fewer runs and won about 10 fewer games while, with Speaker, Cleveland scored about 100 more runs and finished at .500. It was clear that the balance was shifting.  Then the Red Sox had about an identical record in 1917, but finished second to the White Sox with the Indians breathing down their necks.  In 1918 the White Sox inexplicaby collapsed and an exciting pennant race ensued---between the Red Sox and Indians.  Boston won, in part, because when the season was halted they had played all but 7 of their scheduled home games  and still had 21 road games left (where they were 26-30), while the Indians had played more games on the road than at home.  In 1919 the &quot;Black Sox&quot; came back and won---the league at least, finishing just a few games ahead of Cleveland---and Boston. Ah, Boston! Babe Ruth hit all those homeruns and the Red Sox fell into 5th place. The curse of who? 
  Now we are so absorbed in the fact that the Yankees became a championship contender with the acquistion of Ruth in 1920 that we tend to forget what team actually won the World Series that year---the Cleveland Indians.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><input type="button" value="Reply" onclick="CF_Reply('Tresh Fan');" /><input type="button" value="Quote" onclick="CF_Quote('co_42295','Tresh Fan');" /></div><span id="co_42295"><p>RE: Speaker.</p>
<p>I always wondered why there was never a &#8220;Curse of the Gray Eagle.&#8221;  If you look at it, at the time of the Speaker deal the Red Sox were nearly invincible while the Indians were absolutely pathetic, averaging about 100 losses a year. Without Speaker in 1916 Boston still won the World Championship, but they scored about 100 fewer runs and won about 10 fewer games while, with Speaker, Cleveland scored about 100 more runs and finished at .500. It was clear that the balance was shifting.  Then the Red Sox had about an identical record in 1917, but finished second to the White Sox with the Indians breathing down their necks.  In 1918 the White Sox inexplicaby collapsed and an exciting pennant race ensued&#8212;between the Red Sox and Indians.  Boston won, in part, because when the season was halted they had played all but 7 of their scheduled home games  and still had 21 road games left (where they were 26-30), while the Indians had played more games on the road than at home.  In 1919 the &#8220;Black Sox&#8221; came back and won&#8212;the league at least, finishing just a few games ahead of Cleveland&#8212;and Boston. Ah, Boston! Babe Ruth hit all those homeruns and the Red Sox fell into 5th place. The curse of who?<br />
  Now we are so absorbed in the fact that the Yankees became a championship contender with the acquistion of Ruth in 1920 that we tend to forget what team actually won the World Series that year&#8212;the Cleveland Indians.</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Lombardi</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2008/08/26/speaking-of-red-sox/comment-page-1/#comment-42293</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Lombardi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 16:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waswatching.com/?p=6443#comment-42293</guid>
		<description>Speaker is the only outfielder in major league history with over 400 career assists.

You don&#039;t think taking 400 runners off base closes that gap of 700 RCAA?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><input type="button" value="Reply" onclick="CF_Reply('Steve Lombardi');" /><input type="button" value="Quote" onclick="CF_Quote('co_42293','Steve Lombardi');" /></div><span id="co_42293"><p>Speaker is the only outfielder in major league history with over 400 career assists.</p>
<p>You don&#8217;t think taking 400 runners off base closes that gap of 700 RCAA?</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hopbitters</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2008/08/26/speaking-of-red-sox/comment-page-1/#comment-42291</link>
		<dc:creator>hopbitters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 16:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waswatching.com/?p=6443#comment-42291</guid>
		<description>Speaker is an absolute top-tier player without any question and his name should be among the other folks mentioned, but he is 742 RCAA and 60 RSAA short of the best all-around player in baseball history. That&#039;s an entire career of Cap Anson hitting plus Catfish Hunter pitching. No amount of defense is going to bridge that gap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><input type="button" value="Reply" onclick="CF_Reply('hopbitters');" /><input type="button" value="Quote" onclick="CF_Quote('co_42291','hopbitters');" /></div><span id="co_42291"><p>Speaker is an absolute top-tier player without any question and his name should be among the other folks mentioned, but he is 742 RCAA and 60 RSAA short of the best all-around player in baseball history. That&#8217;s an entire career of Cap Anson hitting plus Catfish Hunter pitching. No amount of defense is going to bridge that gap.</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

