Harvey Araton, via his feature in the Times on Omar Minaya, talks about the Yankees Brian Cashman:
Nor will we see any more of the team Cashman built for more than $200 million, its payroll ever rising during an eight-year fade from World Series champion to wild-card contender. Like Minaya, Cashman is an earnest, likeable man. Unlike Minaya, he seldom seems to be called out or held publicly accountable for mistakes — and there have been enough in recent years that would have devastated franchises with lesser payrolls, including the Mets.
Cashman, of course, gets credit for presiding over three championship teams — probably more credit than he deserves given that he inherited the players central to the Yankees’ 1998-2000 success. He gets sympathy points for having to deal with the impetuousness of the Steinbrenners, George to Hank. But granted autonomy on the Johan Santana call last winter, he decided to pass, and that probably doomed Yankee Stadium to a silent final October.
Through it all, the Yankees appear to want Cashman back and he may be sitting pretty, with options elsewhere.
First of all, kudos to Araton for being dead-on here about Cashman. More and more, you see references among the media and bloggers that truly reflect Cashman’s performance as Yankees G.M. – and, perhaps, someday, everyone will “get it.”
The part, here, about Cashman having options got me thinking this evening. Yes, sure, there have been suggestions that Cashman, if he leaves the Yankees, could end up working for the Mariners, Phillies or Nationals…or maybe even the Dodgers. But, it would not shock me, if he left New York, to see Brian Cashman end up working for ESPN – much like Steve Phillips did after he left the Mets. And, should Cashman make such a career move, he just might be pretty good at it. But, I’m not sure if ESPN would want two “former G.M.’s” working at the same time…so, maybe it’s something that won’t happen?
11 Responses to “Araton On Cashman”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
September 30th, 2008 at 1:36 am
But, it would not shock me, if he left New York, to see Brian Cashman end up working for ESPN – much like Steve Phillips did after he left the Mets.
—————–
I don’t really see it, but if someone as dry as Showalter could do it, I guess anyone can…
September 30th, 2008 at 2:12 am
Enough already with Johan Santana. The Mets are where the Yankees are, playing golf. And they’d still both be there now had Ca$hman traded for Santana. Dead issue.
September 30th, 2008 at 9:11 am
Fully deserved or not, Cashman has three World Series and a couple more pennants on his resume. Steve Phillips went to ESPN because no one was about to hire him as GM again. Plenty of teams will want Cashman should he walk away, or, after signing a new deal, get fired.
September 30th, 2008 at 9:13 am
Enough already with Johan Santana. The Mets are where the Yankees are, playing golf. And they’d still both be there now had Ca$hman traded for Santana. Dead issue.
——————————
Couldn’t agree more. Some people really believe that if you take Santana’s 16 wins and just add them to the Yanks’ total of 89 that you’re talking playoffs right now. Never mind that the Yankees scored nearly 200 fewer runs…
September 30th, 2008 at 9:17 am
Consider that the Mets have two players who the Yankees passed on and who may have turned the Yanks’ franchise fortunes for the better had we signed them: Johan and Beltran.
The Yankees were foolish, in retrospect, not to make the Santana deal (and I was also drinking that ‘pitch the kids’ kool-aid last December).
And the owner’s foolish insistence on signing Randy Johnson did not leave enough $$$ for Beltran.
Aside: the Beltran matter is why I find it hard to blame Cashman for too much. To me, the story of the past 8 years is: “What players would Cashman have signed or not traded away (Ted Lilly?) had ownership (and the Tampa crowd) not been so meddlesome?”
September 30th, 2008 at 9:29 am
Why are folks so convinced that Beltran was the missing piece for the Yanks?
September 30th, 2008 at 9:36 am
First of all, kudos to Araton for being dead-on here about Cashman. More and more, you see references among the media and bloggers that truly reflect Cashman’s performance as Yankees G.M. – and, perhaps, someday, everyone will “get it.”
————–
As long as people keep referring to the $200M payroll, they won’t “get it.”
Fact of the matter is, a good portion of the payroll is tied up in players like ARod, Jeter, Posada, Rivera, Giambi, Pettitte and the like.
I don’t think anyone’s second guessing the acquisition of those players.
September 30th, 2008 at 9:37 am
~~ Why are folks so convinced that Beltran was the missing piece for the Yanks? ~~
He fills a void (center field, speed, episodic clutch hitting) and would have been more comfortable not being perceived as the franchise player, which is how he arrived on the Mets.
And BTW, not _the_ missing piece, but _a_ missing piece.
September 30th, 2008 at 9:38 am
Why are folks so convinced that Beltran was the missing piece for the Yanks?
——–
Probably for the same reason people think Santana was the missing piece for the Yanks.
September 30th, 2008 at 9:42 am
He fills a void (center field, speed, episodic clutch hitting)
—————–
You can argue that you have or had that now.
I would like to take a closer look at the defensive numbers, I believe the players are closer than we give credit.
September 30th, 2008 at 4:53 pm
I watch a lot of Met games. I was down on Beltran after 2006 (looked at strike 3 to end the season against St. L.). But having seen him since then his value has become apparent to me. It is not unreasonable to say that he is among the very best center fielders right now. The main thing he seems to lack is leadership on and off the field, but you can’t hold that against him.