<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Russo:  Beltran/Cano Deal In The Works?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://waswatching.com/2008/10/08/russo-beltrancano-deal-in-the-works/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://waswatching.com/2008/10/08/russo-beltrancano-deal-in-the-works/</link>
	<description>Laconic Commentary From A Yankeeland Zealot</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 12:07:40 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Seriously? &#171; iYankees</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2008/10/08/russo-beltrancano-deal-in-the-works/comment-page-1/#comment-91736</link>
		<dc:creator>Seriously? &#171; iYankees</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 06:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waswatching.com/?p=7851#comment-91736</guid>
		<description>[...] A Carlos Beltran for Robinson Cano deal [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A Carlos Beltran for Robinson Cano deal [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gossip girls&#8230; &#171; iYankees</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2008/10/08/russo-beltrancano-deal-in-the-works/comment-page-1/#comment-80190</link>
		<dc:creator>Gossip girls&#8230; &#171; iYankees</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 10:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waswatching.com/?p=7851#comment-80190</guid>
		<description>[...] be honest, I don&#8217;t believe anything Russo says, really. He came up with that magnificent Carlos Beltran for Robinson Cano rumor a few months ago and also stirred the pot with his Aaron Rowand stories. With that said, there are [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] be honest, I don&#8217;t believe anything Russo says, really. He came up with that magnificent Carlos Beltran for Robinson Cano rumor a few months ago and also stirred the pot with his Aaron Rowand stories. With that said, there are [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nos1</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2008/10/08/russo-beltrancano-deal-in-the-works/comment-page-1/#comment-50028</link>
		<dc:creator>nos1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 17:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waswatching.com/?p=7851#comment-50028</guid>
		<description>If cashman makes this trade it&#039;ll be like Kazmir for Zambrano all over again, but the yanks are giving up MORE!!!! I dont know why they dont just play Damon left, gardner cf and nady right. The red sox are doing fine with ellisbury/crisp in the field and I think gardner is about the same as those two. For a team that is going to need some serious pitching and i hope they go after burnett instead of CC. If this trade for for Santana then I wouldn&#039;t have a problem with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><input type="button" value="Reply" onclick="CF_Reply('nos1');" /><input type="button" value="Quote" onclick="CF_Quote('co_50028','nos1');" /></div><span id="co_50028"><p>If cashman makes this trade it&#8217;ll be like Kazmir for Zambrano all over again, but the yanks are giving up MORE!!!! I dont know why they dont just play Damon left, gardner cf and nady right. The red sox are doing fine with ellisbury/crisp in the field and I think gardner is about the same as those two. For a team that is going to need some serious pitching and i hope they go after burnett instead of CC. If this trade for for Santana then I wouldn&#8217;t have a problem with it.</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beltran to Yankees rumor - Blowout Cards Forums</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2008/10/08/russo-beltrancano-deal-in-the-works/comment-page-1/#comment-49340</link>
		<dc:creator>Beltran to Yankees rumor - Blowout Cards Forums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 22:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waswatching.com/?p=7851#comment-49340</guid>
		<description>[...] to Yankees rumor     Say it aint so....  Russo: Beltran/Cano Deal In The Works? : WasWatching.com     __________________ &quot;18 Wins and 1 Giant [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to Yankees rumor     Say it aint so&#8230;.  Russo: Beltran/Cano Deal In The Works? : WasWatching.com     __________________ &quot;18 Wins and 1 Giant [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MetsBlog.com &#187; Buzz: Mets taking calls on Beltran?</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2008/10/08/russo-beltrancano-deal-in-the-works/comment-page-1/#comment-49203</link>
		<dc:creator>MetsBlog.com &#187; Buzz: Mets taking calls on Beltran?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 15:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waswatching.com/?p=7851#comment-49203</guid>
		<description>[...] Lombardi posted the rumor on WasWatching.com and analyzed the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Lombardi posted the rumor on WasWatching.com and analyzed the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Projo Sox Blog</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2008/10/08/russo-beltrancano-deal-in-the-works/comment-page-1/#comment-49182</link>
		<dc:creator>Projo Sox Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waswatching.com/?p=7851#comment-49182</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Baseball Today: Friday, October 10...&lt;/strong&gt;

CLOSE ENCOUNTER: That&#039;s what our headline in this morning&#039;s newspaper called the ALCS matchup between the Red Sox and Rays, which starts tonight.......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Baseball Today: Friday, October 10&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>CLOSE ENCOUNTER: That&#8217;s what our headline in this morning&#8217;s newspaper called the ALCS matchup between the Red Sox and Rays, which starts tonight&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: butchie22</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2008/10/08/russo-beltrancano-deal-in-the-works/comment-page-1/#comment-48986</link>
		<dc:creator>butchie22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 20:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waswatching.com/?p=7851#comment-48986</guid>
		<description>Paying for Cano&#039;s contract? The Yankees are stupid but not that stupid. Antone, you should be Mets GM BECAUSE you realize what the Mets greatest weakness is (in a fashion): their relievers. BUT Omar is a semi-dolt who is talking about Manny when they need to shore up the closer role and their relief core. If the Mets are smart , they&#039;ll ask for Cano, Coke and another reliever. Kennedy? Kennedy will end up in a black hole like Pittsburgh.........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><input type="button" value="Reply" onclick="CF_Reply('butchie22');" /><input type="button" value="Quote" onclick="CF_Quote('co_48986','butchie22');" /></div><span id="co_48986"><p>Paying for Cano&#8217;s contract? The Yankees are stupid but not that stupid. Antone, you should be Mets GM BECAUSE you realize what the Mets greatest weakness is (in a fashion): their relievers. BUT Omar is a semi-dolt who is talking about Manny when they need to shore up the closer role and their relief core. If the Mets are smart , they&#8217;ll ask for Cano, Coke and another reliever. Kennedy? Kennedy will end up in a black hole like Pittsburgh&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hot Stove already cooking &#171; Rivera&#8217;s Cutter</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2008/10/08/russo-beltrancano-deal-in-the-works/comment-page-1/#comment-48977</link>
		<dc:creator>Hot Stove already cooking &#171; Rivera&#8217;s Cutter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 19:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waswatching.com/?p=7851#comment-48977</guid>
		<description>[...] we get the following: Frank Russo, on New York Baseball Digest Radio’s Yankee Special, mentioned that his connections [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] we get the following: Frank Russo, on New York Baseball Digest Radio’s Yankee Special, mentioned that his connections [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: antone</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2008/10/08/russo-beltrancano-deal-in-the-works/comment-page-1/#comment-48968</link>
		<dc:creator>antone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 18:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waswatching.com/?p=7851#comment-48968</guid>
		<description>Quite frankly, given how much money we’d be saving the Mets, Cano/Kennedy for Beltran is really all it should require.
----------------------------------------------------
Mets can&#039;t trade Beltran without getting a reliever back though I don&#039;t think.  That&#039;s their biggest weakness, so it makes no sense to trade one of their best players without addressing that need, even if they do go after K-Rod. 

I don&#039;t see this trade happening though because who plays CF for the Mets once Beltran is gone? 

It&#039;s funny though because I bet if changed the name Kennedy with Aceves people wouldn&#039;t be so up in arms about this rumored trade, even though there is no difference between the two right now.  I highly doubt the paying of Cano&#039;s contract would be accurate...they dont want to get rid of him that bad I don&#039;t think.

What kind of pitcher would Cano return anyway?    Something similar to the Delmon Young-Matt Garza trade or someone worse than that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><input type="button" value="Reply" onclick="CF_Reply('antone');" /><input type="button" value="Quote" onclick="CF_Quote('co_48968','antone');" /></div><span id="co_48968"><p>Quite frankly, given how much money we’d be saving the Mets, Cano/Kennedy for Beltran is really all it should require.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
Mets can&#8217;t trade Beltran without getting a reliever back though I don&#8217;t think.  That&#8217;s their biggest weakness, so it makes no sense to trade one of their best players without addressing that need, even if they do go after K-Rod. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see this trade happening though because who plays CF for the Mets once Beltran is gone? </p>
<p>It&#8217;s funny though because I bet if changed the name Kennedy with Aceves people wouldn&#8217;t be so up in arms about this rumored trade, even though there is no difference between the two right now.  I highly doubt the paying of Cano&#8217;s contract would be accurate&#8230;they dont want to get rid of him that bad I don&#8217;t think.</p>
<p>What kind of pitcher would Cano return anyway?    Something similar to the Delmon Young-Matt Garza trade or someone worse than that?</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MJ</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2008/10/08/russo-beltrancano-deal-in-the-works/comment-page-1/#comment-48961</link>
		<dc:creator>MJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 17:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waswatching.com/?p=7851#comment-48961</guid>
		<description>Quite frankly, given how much money we&#039;d be saving the Mets, Cano/Kennedy for Beltran is really all it should require.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><input type="button" value="Reply" onclick="CF_Reply('MJ');" /><input type="button" value="Quote" onclick="CF_Quote('co_48961','MJ');" /></div><span id="co_48961"><p>Quite frankly, given how much money we&#8217;d be saving the Mets, Cano/Kennedy for Beltran is really all it should require.</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
