• Davidoff: Santana Would Have Put Yanks In Post-Season

    Posted by on October 10th, 2008 · Comments (10)

    Ken Davidoff says, despite the Yankees weakened offense in 2008, Johan Santana would have put the team in the post-season. And, he uses some math to prove it. It’s an interesting read. Click here to check it out.

    Then again, even with Santana, would the Yankees have made it past the ALDS…especially if they had to face the Angels in round one?

    Post to Twitter

    Comments on Davidoff: Santana Would Have Put Yanks In Post-Season

    1. butchie22
      October 10th, 2008 | 5:15 pm

      Davidoff is so wrong. The Yankees were terrible in regards to RISP. Their runs scored was equivalent to the Blue Jays. The Bluebirds(one of the worst GIDP, RISP teams this year) have the most dominant pitching in the AL and they came in 4th, so what the hell is Davidoff yapping about? The Yanks couldn’t get a clutch hit to save their lives. Can you imagine Santana pitching a game and losing 1-0 because of that poor RISP factor. That seems more likely than Davidoff’s moronic musings.

    2. Raf
      October 10th, 2008 | 6:09 pm

      a 789-665 run differential produces a Pythagenport record of 95-67, which was precisely the record Boston posted to win the AL wild card.
      —————-
      Which is all well and good, but for one thing; the 2008 Angels had a pythag record of 88-74. The Rays? 92-70. Toronto? 93-69.

      Unfortunately, MLB doesn’t count Pythag wins.

    3. DJ21996
      October 10th, 2008 | 6:23 pm

      I kind of agree. But I think we would have made it if Wang was healthy for the full season also.

      A healthy Wang + Santana?? Sky would have been the limit.

    4. thenewguy
      October 10th, 2008 | 9:36 pm

      Pitching wasn’t the problem. It was the hitting. We all know this.

    5. Raf
      October 10th, 2008 | 9:55 pm

      Pitching wasn’t the problem. It was the hitting. We all know this.
      —–
      I know, I know, but it’s a lot easier to complain about the Santana nontrade.

    6. Don
      October 10th, 2008 | 10:50 pm

      Santana vs. the Bosox in the Fens. That’s good history, so I hear.

      Stop beating this dead horse Steve. TIA.

    7. October 10th, 2008 | 11:06 pm

      ~~But I think we would have made it if Wang was healthy for the full season also.~~

      And, if Babe Ruth were still alive, and only 29 years old, and still playing for the Yanks today, they would have made it too…I’m just saying… ;-)

    8. butchie22
      October 11th, 2008 | 11:08 am

      Don, good call. Santana was terrible in Fenway lifetime. That’s why even Boston’s offer was a bluff. That said, the Mets won 88 games right? Did they go to the playoffs? The whole Santana fiasco is losing steam…….

    9. Jake1
      October 12th, 2008 | 2:08 am

      Pitching wasn’t the problem?

      We had Ponson, Rasner, and Pavano make a ton of starts.

      And pitching wasn’t a problem?

      Didn’t the last few yrs show that a great offense is nothing compared to great pitching?

    10. Raf
      October 12th, 2008 | 12:02 pm

      The pitching, as a whole, was around the same in 08 that they were in 07. The offense didn’t

    Leave a reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.