<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chien-Ming Wang 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://waswatching.com/2008/11/11/chien-ming-wang-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://waswatching.com/2008/11/11/chien-ming-wang-2009/</link>
	<description>Holy Cow! We never take cannoli from a huckleberry.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:35:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ken</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2008/11/11/chien-ming-wang-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-58497</link>
		<dc:creator>ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 18:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waswatching.com/?p=8600#comment-58497</guid>
		<description>Everyone is looking for the next &#039;Ace&#039;, &#039;Number One Guy&#039;, &#039;the Next Beckett&#039;, etc. These guys are very rare. Even Beckett himself, is not always &#039;Beckett&#039;.

Wang should have a spot in the Yanks rotation for the next ten years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><input type="button" value="Reply" onclick="CF_Reply('ken');" /><input type="button" value="Quote" onclick="CF_Quote('co_58497','ken');" /></div><span id="co_58497"><p>Everyone is looking for the next &#8216;Ace&#8217;, &#8216;Number One Guy&#8217;, &#8216;the Next Beckett&#8217;, etc. These guys are very rare. Even Beckett himself, is not always &#8216;Beckett&#8217;.</p>
<p>Wang should have a spot in the Yanks rotation for the next ten years.</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph M</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2008/11/11/chien-ming-wang-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-58481</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 16:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waswatching.com/?p=8600#comment-58481</guid>
		<description>Last year when the hot stove serving was a steady diet of Santana talk, I thought the cornerstone of the Yankee offer should have been Wang(the other players on our side would have been Kennedy and Duncan).  I think Wang has already peaked (sure hope I&#039;m wrong now), the questions left include durability and what will be the typical Wang season going forward.  I see him turning into a 12 to 14 win starter with 4.5 era (at his best).  I thought the Yanks missed a golden opportunity to flip him for a stud front end guy (as it turned out the trade I mentioned was discussed the Minnesota side but turned down by the Yanks).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><input type="button" value="Reply" onclick="CF_Reply('Joseph M');" /><input type="button" value="Quote" onclick="CF_Quote('co_58481','Joseph M');" /></div><span id="co_58481"><p>Last year when the hot stove serving was a steady diet of Santana talk, I thought the cornerstone of the Yankee offer should have been Wang(the other players on our side would have been Kennedy and Duncan).  I think Wang has already peaked (sure hope I&#8217;m wrong now), the questions left include durability and what will be the typical Wang season going forward.  I see him turning into a 12 to 14 win starter with 4.5 era (at his best).  I thought the Yanks missed a golden opportunity to flip him for a stud front end guy (as it turned out the trade I mentioned was discussed the Minnesota side but turned down by the Yanks).</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat F</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2008/11/11/chien-ming-wang-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-58467</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 14:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waswatching.com/?p=8600#comment-58467</guid>
		<description>steve-

if the yankees&#039; reasoning for not giving wang a contract extension were health concerns, i don&#039;t think they would be relying on him for a spot in the rotation next year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><input type="button" value="Reply" onclick="CF_Reply('Pat F');" /><input type="button" value="Quote" onclick="CF_Quote('co_58467','Pat F');" /></div><span id="co_58467"><p>steve-</p>
<p>if the yankees&#8217; reasoning for not giving wang a contract extension were health concerns, i don&#8217;t think they would be relying on him for a spot in the rotation next year.</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
