preload
Animal House (1978) Yanks Offer Abreu Arbitration
Nov 19

Perhaps, at the least, it will make life interesting for the Red Sox and their interest in Tex?

What brings this on? See this “intell” via Tony Massarotti:

Here’s a prediction: By the time this is over, win or lose, the Red Sox effectively will have made Mark Teixeira the largest contract offer in the history of your storied franchise.

Preposterous, you say? Clearly, you have not been paying attention. Since the Red Sox changed ownership, management, and philosophies early in 2002, the new owners and operators of the Red Sox have stopped at virtually nothing to acquire those things they have coveted most. When the best of the rest were bidding $35 million-$40 million to acquire the rights to Daisuke Matsuzaka, the Red Sox bid $51.11 million. When the rest of the world wondered why J.D. Drew opted out of his contract in Los Angeles, the Red Sox dropped $70 million in Drew’s lap. And knowing what we know now, nothing might have been more aggressive than the $36 million the Sox paid for Julio Lugo.

The point is this:

When the Sox want something enough, they make sure they get it.

In the case of Teixeira, rest assured that the Sox want him, no matter what games are being played by club officials. Publicly and privately, the Sox are saying nothing about their interest in Teixeira and playing dumb every time his name comes up. It’s as sure a sign as any that they are preparing to go to extraordinary lengths. Last year, in the midst of the Johan Santana trade talks, the Sox were far more forthcoming about who and what they were willing to offer. When all was said and done, the Sox were not interested in acquiring Santana so much as they were interested in driving up the price for the rival Yankees; as it turned out, they kept Santana out of the Bronx altogether.

Two years ago, when the Red Sox signed Matsuzaka, many were stunned at the lengths to which the Red Sox went. We later learned that the Sox had Matsuzaka on their radar for years, that their pursuit of him had been plotted for some time. Now the Sox’ free agent of choice is Teixeira, who long has been due to hit the open market in the fall of 2008 and whom the Red Sox have lusted after for quite some time.

Do you really think they came this far to make him some sort of halfhearted offer?

Then again, maybe the Yankees are hoping that the Angels make the Sox sweat? Via Mike DiGiovanna:

The Angels have targeted Teixeira as their top priority, but their strategy appears to be to wait until several teams have made formal offers, then make Teixeira a very aggressive offer with a firm deadline for him to accept or reject it.

There has been speculation Teixeira is seeking a deal in the 10-year, $200-million range. The Angels are willing to pay Teixeira $20 million a year, but they would prefer a five- or six-year contract.

One development working in the Angels’ favor: The New York Yankees acquired first baseman Nick Swisher from the Chicago White Sox and apparently won’t enter the Teixeira sweepstakes.

You know…Scott Boras would probably throw the Yankees a bone for getting in the mix, at least just for show, right? Then again, maybe the Yankees are worried about teasing their fan base if they just play footsie with Tex and not make a real move?

4 Responses to “Maybe The Yanks Should Dance With Teixeira?”

  1. Joseph M Says:

    The Yanks would be better served focusing their attention on Manny and CC and trying to trade for another pitcher.

  2. OnceIWasAYankeeFan Says:

    Since I really want Teix on the Sox, my fear is that the Yankees break the bank after losing out on C.C., who I think could very easily end up with a good enough offer from a west coast team to spurn the Yankees. So the best outcome would be for the Yanks to get C.C. (preferably after he makes them sweat it out and add another few zeros) because I am pretty sure we can outbid the Angels, regardless of how “aggressive” they are (plus deadlines never work with Boras anyway).

  3. butchie22 Says:

    Maseroti is a Red Sox shill. They wanted Contreras, did they get him? The list goes on…. The Red Sox would give Teixeira a 10 year deal, Tony,unh? He must be kidding everyone. 200 mill is a lot for the Red Sox and remember that Manny got 200 mill from Duquette’s regime not Theo’s. Would they even pay 25 mill a year for him? NO WAY! They have tons of young kids that cost nothing, why go to an inefficient model and piss away money 25 mill a year when their primary adjustment is relief pitching. I can’t see Theo and Co sign off on getting this guy , paying him and giving him the years. Teix is poorly cast for Boston is this regard: they have Lowell who is perfect for this team and Youk too, it will cost TOO much money even for Boston. Dan Shaugnessey was on the Miked Up show yesterday and I got the impression that Teix is not that much of a

    Manny? Manny is poorly cast for the Yanks and the Mets. OMar was talking to Manny? Is he insane? The team needs bullpen help and he wants that butcher in the field for three years. If Omar had been the GM of an AL team, Manny makes sense BUT since they have zero flexibility with regards to DHing him, this is a dumb move. Omar makes Cash Man look like a brain surgeon. The yanks have no business with Manny either. He will be a flop with the Yanks, they have a million DHs and they are going to pay another one 25 mill a year? That makes no sense. It will be a total media circus if he comes here,too.

  4. Raf Says:

    IIRC, Manny wasn’t that bad in the field his brief time as a Dodger. Having said that, no team is going to sign him with the expectation he play gold glove caliber defense. His bat will make up for any defensive deficiencies he may have.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Copyright © 2005 - 2009 and In Perpetuity by WasWatching.com

The opinions expressed by the WasWatching.com bloggers are theirs alone and do not reflect the opinions of Sterling Entertainment Enterprises, LLC or any of its affiliates or subsidiaries. Sterling Entertainment Enterprises, LLC or any of its affiliates or subsidiaries are not responsible for the inaccuracy of content posted on WasWatching.com.