Comments on: Joe 2.0 Vs. 1.0: “General Joe” Just As Good As “Clueless Joe” http://waswatching.com/2008/11/21/joe-20-vs-joe-10-general-joe-just-as-good-as-clueless-joe/ Holy Cow! We never take cannoli from a huckleberry. Fri, 25 May 2012 22:39:35 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: yankees27th http://waswatching.com/2008/11/21/joe-20-vs-joe-10-general-joe-just-as-good-as-clueless-joe/comment-page-1/#comment-63050 yankees27th Sat, 22 Nov 2008 18:31:57 +0000 http://waswatching.com/?p=8928#comment-63050 No, that means it's just impossible to tell when to give credit to a manager and when to give it to a different coach/the actual players/other factors.

No, that means it’s just impossible to tell when to give credit to a manager and when to give it to a different coach/the actual players/other factors.

]]> By: Raf http://waswatching.com/2008/11/21/joe-20-vs-joe-10-general-joe-just-as-good-as-clueless-joe/comment-page-1/#comment-63049 Raf Sat, 22 Nov 2008 18:05:30 +0000 http://waswatching.com/?p=8928#comment-63049 Does that mean the Dodgers made the playoffs in spite of Torre?

Does that mean the Dodgers made the playoffs in spite of Torre?

]]> By: yankees27th http://waswatching.com/2008/11/21/joe-20-vs-joe-10-general-joe-just-as-good-as-clueless-joe/comment-page-1/#comment-63047 yankees27th Sat, 22 Nov 2008 17:26:39 +0000 http://waswatching.com/?p=8928#comment-63047 Those statistics sound like they describe the team as a whole, not the manager.

Those statistics sound like they describe the team as a whole, not the manager.

]]>