<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Hardball Times Baseball Annual 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://waswatching.com/2008/12/09/the-hardball-times-baseball-annual-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://waswatching.com/2008/12/09/the-hardball-times-baseball-annual-2009/</link>
	<description>Laconic Commentary From A Yankeeland Zealot</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 02:53:38 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nick Swisher&#8217;s Defense At First Base : WasWatching.com</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2008/12/09/the-hardball-times-baseball-annual-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-71472</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Swisher&#8217;s Defense At First Base : WasWatching.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 03:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waswatching.com/?p=9309#comment-71472</guid>
		<description>[...] the Hardball Times Baseball Annual 2009, they give fielders “grades” which are evenly distributed between “A” and “F” based on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the Hardball Times Baseball Annual 2009, they give fielders “grades” which are evenly distributed between “A” and “F” based on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: With Mike Cameron You Get&#8230; : WasWatching.com</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2008/12/09/the-hardball-times-baseball-annual-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-69390</link>
		<dc:creator>With Mike Cameron You Get&#8230; : WasWatching.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 03:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waswatching.com/?p=9309#comment-69390</guid>
		<description>[...] how is Mike Cameron&#8217;s fielding? In the Hardball Times Baseball Annual 2009, they give fielders &#8220;grades&#8221; which are evenly distributed between &#8220;A&#8221; and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] how is Mike Cameron&#8217;s fielding? In the Hardball Times Baseball Annual 2009, they give fielders &#8220;grades&#8221; which are evenly distributed between &#8220;A&#8221; and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Lombardi</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2008/12/09/the-hardball-times-baseball-annual-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-68688</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Lombardi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 02:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waswatching.com/?p=9309#comment-68688</guid>
		<description>My pleasure to review the book, as always studes.

Thanks for this additional information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><input type="button" value="Reply" onclick="CF_Reply('Steve Lombardi');" /><input type="button" value="Quote" onclick="CF_Quote('co_68688','Steve Lombardi');" /></div><span id="co_68688"><p>My pleasure to review the book, as always studes.</p>
<p>Thanks for this additional information.</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: studes</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2008/12/09/the-hardball-times-baseball-annual-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-68532</link>
		<dc:creator>studes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 21:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waswatching.com/?p=9309#comment-68532</guid>
		<description>Hey Steve,

Thanks for the review.  I&#039;d point out a few things:

1. There were eight more articles this year, 25% more than in the past.  This was a big increase, but we decided it was worth it to make the book better.  So, even though there were some articles you didn&#039;t like as much, there were more articles in total.  I&#039;m pretty confident that there were just as many articles that you liked compared to previous years.  Maybe even more!

2. As a result of the expanded content, we decided to bring more voices into THT.  Roel&#039;s voice is different, and some people really like it--Others don&#039;t.  Understood.  But we think the diversity of voices makes the Annual stronger overall.

3. There were no in-depth numbers in Sean&#039;s fielding article, because he&#039;s covered them before on the THT site.  There are references to those articles at the end of Sean&#039;s article in the Annual.

Thanks again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><input type="button" value="Reply" onclick="CF_Reply('studes');" /><input type="button" value="Quote" onclick="CF_Quote('co_68532','studes');" /></div><span id="co_68532"><p>Hey Steve,</p>
<p>Thanks for the review.  I&#8217;d point out a few things:</p>
<p>1. There were eight more articles this year, 25% more than in the past.  This was a big increase, but we decided it was worth it to make the book better.  So, even though there were some articles you didn&#8217;t like as much, there were more articles in total.  I&#8217;m pretty confident that there were just as many articles that you liked compared to previous years.  Maybe even more!</p>
<p>2. As a result of the expanded content, we decided to bring more voices into THT.  Roel&#8217;s voice is different, and some people really like it&#8211;Others don&#8217;t.  Understood.  But we think the diversity of voices makes the Annual stronger overall.</p>
<p>3. There were no in-depth numbers in Sean&#8217;s fielding article, because he&#8217;s covered them before on the THT site.  There are references to those articles at the end of Sean&#8217;s article in the Annual.</p>
<p>Thanks again.</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
