<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Red Sox Done Dealing With Boras?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://waswatching.com/2009/01/11/red-sox-done-dealing-with-boras/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://waswatching.com/2009/01/11/red-sox-done-dealing-with-boras/</link>
	<description>Holy Cow! We never take cannoli from a huckleberry.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 07:41:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Raf</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2009/01/11/red-sox-done-dealing-with-boras/comment-page-1/#comment-89489</link>
		<dc:creator>Raf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 15:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waswatching.com/?p=9862#comment-89489</guid>
		<description>Also, we have to take into consideration that we have cases of other players opting out of their contract, Rodriguez &amp; Burnett, so I don&#039;t think Boras should be blamed for Drew opting out of his contract.  At the end of the day, it&#039;s the player&#039;s decision, not the agent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><input type="button" value="Reply" onclick="CF_Reply('Raf');" /><input type="button" value="Quote" onclick="CF_Quote('co_89489','Raf');" /></div><span id="co_89489"><p>Also, we have to take into consideration that we have cases of other players opting out of their contract, Rodriguez &amp; Burnett, so I don&#8217;t think Boras should be blamed for Drew opting out of his contract.  At the end of the day, it&#8217;s the player&#8217;s decision, not the agent.</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: butchie22</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2009/01/11/red-sox-done-dealing-with-boras/comment-page-1/#comment-89446</link>
		<dc:creator>butchie22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waswatching.com/?p=9862#comment-89446</guid>
		<description>Dude, if you don’t know, then I can’t help you…because you’re choosing to ignore all the reports already out there that suggest the Drew deal was cooked. Quote from Steve

Steve, there are some people who have drips from NESN and WEEI going directly into their system at all times. Some people either suffer from extreme hubris to use the word stupid when that same person looks stupid making the claim.Especially when that person is either suffering from the arrogance of youth OR the immaturity of an aged fanboy. It has widely been reported that Boras and Drew both played the Dodgers. Drew claimed he wanted to stay there in LA and in the meanwhile Boras had been talking to the Red Sox. Was it underhanded? Extremely! This story was well reported,BUT on the Stanilist Red Pox network where Henry and Co are as pure as snow. Please with some people , especially Benedict Arnolds who refuse to accept the truth AND make silly immature and baseless accusations against people even though the Benedict Arnold/Quisling had been wrong. Said people ARE persona non grata to me, pure and simple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><input type="button" value="Reply" onclick="CF_Reply('butchie22');" /><input type="button" value="Quote" onclick="CF_Quote('co_89446','butchie22');" /></div><span id="co_89446"><p>Dude, if you don’t know, then I can’t help you…because you’re choosing to ignore all the reports already out there that suggest the Drew deal was cooked. Quote from Steve</p>
<p>Steve, there are some people who have drips from NESN and WEEI going directly into their system at all times. Some people either suffer from extreme hubris to use the word stupid when that same person looks stupid making the claim.Especially when that person is either suffering from the arrogance of youth OR the immaturity of an aged fanboy. It has widely been reported that Boras and Drew both played the Dodgers. Drew claimed he wanted to stay there in LA and in the meanwhile Boras had been talking to the Red Sox. Was it underhanded? Extremely! This story was well reported,BUT on the Stanilist Red Pox network where Henry and Co are as pure as snow. Please with some people , especially Benedict Arnolds who refuse to accept the truth AND make silly immature and baseless accusations against people even though the Benedict Arnold/Quisling had been wrong. Said people ARE persona non grata to me, pure and simple.</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YankCrank</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2009/01/11/red-sox-done-dealing-with-boras/comment-page-1/#comment-89405</link>
		<dc:creator>YankCrank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waswatching.com/?p=9862#comment-89405</guid>
		<description>Toally agree with bfriley76. The Sox have every right to be angry and I would too, but they certainly won&#039;t stop dealing with Boras for good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><input type="button" value="Reply" onclick="CF_Reply('YankCrank');" /><input type="button" value="Quote" onclick="CF_Quote('co_89405','YankCrank');" /></div><span id="co_89405"><p>Toally agree with bfriley76. The Sox have every right to be angry and I would too, but they certainly won&#8217;t stop dealing with Boras for good.</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OnceIWasAYankeeFan</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2009/01/11/red-sox-done-dealing-with-boras/comment-page-1/#comment-89398</link>
		<dc:creator>OnceIWasAYankeeFan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waswatching.com/?p=9862#comment-89398</guid>
		<description>OK, now I get your point - Boras acted &quot;underhanded&quot; with the Dodgers in the Drew situation, which helped the Red Sox, so how can the Sox be hypocritical and get upset when he acts underhanded with them during the Teixeira &quot;negotiation&quot;.

There&#039;s only one big problem:
Boras was never accused of acting underhanded with the Dodgers.  It was Drew, who implied or flat out stated he wouldn&#039;t go anywhere, who was criticized, and it was the Red Sox who were accused of letting Drew or Boras know that there would be a big contract waiting if he left L.A.

Those are the two parties which supposedly acted poorly.  Not Boras.  Boras was Boras all along.  He didn&#039;t catch flak over that decision to opt out.  Drew caught flak, and then the Red Sox did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><input type="button" value="Reply" onclick="CF_Reply('OnceIWasAYankeeFan');" /><input type="button" value="Quote" onclick="CF_Quote('co_89398','OnceIWasAYankeeFan');" /></div><span id="co_89398"><p>OK, now I get your point &#8211; Boras acted &#8220;underhanded&#8221; with the Dodgers in the Drew situation, which helped the Red Sox, so how can the Sox be hypocritical and get upset when he acts underhanded with them during the Teixeira &#8220;negotiation&#8221;.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s only one big problem:<br />
Boras was never accused of acting underhanded with the Dodgers.  It was Drew, who implied or flat out stated he wouldn&#8217;t go anywhere, who was criticized, and it was the Red Sox who were accused of letting Drew or Boras know that there would be a big contract waiting if he left L.A.</p>
<p>Those are the two parties which supposedly acted poorly.  Not Boras.  Boras was Boras all along.  He didn&#8217;t catch flak over that decision to opt out.  Drew caught flak, and then the Red Sox did.</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bfriley76</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2009/01/11/red-sox-done-dealing-with-boras/comment-page-1/#comment-89397</link>
		<dc:creator>bfriley76</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waswatching.com/?p=9862#comment-89397</guid>
		<description>The Red Sox seem to be players on almost every high profile free agent (as do the Yankees). Boras represents a good portion of those players. Does that mean the Red Sox are going to put themselves at a disadvantage by refusing to deal with him? I highly doubt it. Take it further and play devils advocate. Lets say a current Red Sox player decides to sign with Boras...lets say Youklis. Does that mean that they won&#039;t extend him because of his agent? If that&#039;s the path they took, they&#039;d be incredibly stupid. I&#039;m sure their smarting from the Tex situation, but cooler heads will eventually prevail. Refusing to deal with Boras would, most likely, end up being a &quot;cutting off your nose to spite your face&quot; type situation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><input type="button" value="Reply" onclick="CF_Reply('bfriley76');" /><input type="button" value="Quote" onclick="CF_Quote('co_89397','bfriley76');" /></div><span id="co_89397"><p>The Red Sox seem to be players on almost every high profile free agent (as do the Yankees). Boras represents a good portion of those players. Does that mean the Red Sox are going to put themselves at a disadvantage by refusing to deal with him? I highly doubt it. Take it further and play devils advocate. Lets say a current Red Sox player decides to sign with Boras&#8230;lets say Youklis. Does that mean that they won&#8217;t extend him because of his agent? If that&#8217;s the path they took, they&#8217;d be incredibly stupid. I&#8217;m sure their smarting from the Tex situation, but cooler heads will eventually prevail. Refusing to deal with Boras would, most likely, end up being a &#8220;cutting off your nose to spite your face&#8221; type situation.</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ken</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2009/01/11/red-sox-done-dealing-with-boras/comment-page-1/#comment-88914</link>
		<dc:creator>ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 04:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waswatching.com/?p=9862#comment-88914</guid>
		<description>As much as I do not like Boras, he is motivated by his first-hand knowledge of the supreme greed and arrogance of the MLB owners. And since Fay Vincent, there has not been a true &#039;commissioner&#039; to keep the owners somewhat accountable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><input type="button" value="Reply" onclick="CF_Reply('ken');" /><input type="button" value="Quote" onclick="CF_Quote('co_88914','ken');" /></div><span id="co_88914"><p>As much as I do not like Boras, he is motivated by his first-hand knowledge of the supreme greed and arrogance of the MLB owners. And since Fay Vincent, there has not been a true &#8216;commissioner&#8217; to keep the owners somewhat accountable.</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Lombardi</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2009/01/11/red-sox-done-dealing-with-boras/comment-page-1/#comment-88894</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Lombardi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 03:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waswatching.com/?p=9862#comment-88894</guid>
		<description>~~How did they possibly deal “underhanded” with Boras in the Drew situation? ~~

Dude, if you don&#039;t know, then I can&#039;t help you...because you&#039;re choosing to ignore all the reports already out there that suggest the Drew deal was cooked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><input type="button" value="Reply" onclick="CF_Reply('Steve Lombardi');" /><input type="button" value="Quote" onclick="CF_Quote('co_88894','Steve Lombardi');" /></div><span id="co_88894"><p>~~How did they possibly deal “underhanded” with Boras in the Drew situation? ~~</p>
<p>Dude, if you don&#8217;t know, then I can&#8217;t help you&#8230;because you&#8217;re choosing to ignore all the reports already out there that suggest the Drew deal was cooked.</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kia</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2009/01/11/red-sox-done-dealing-with-boras/comment-page-1/#comment-88892</link>
		<dc:creator>kia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 03:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waswatching.com/?p=9862#comment-88892</guid>
		<description>Lets see what Boras did so far with the Red Sox management in Tex&#039;s case.
According to Tex himself he made his decision two weeks before Christmas that he wanted to be a Yankee. He said that he always liked the Yankees since he was a young kid. His wife wanted him to be a yankee. She didnt like Boston. She wanted to be closer to her family. All this is a nice story and good for her that she wanted him to be a Yankee. The problem is the Red Sox owner and Theo had no idea. They thought that they were close to sign Tex they flew to Texas thinking that they were going to land him only to find out that Boras wanted more money No word from Boras or Tex that he had no plans of ever going to Red Sox. How you would feel Steve if somebody did this to you? Waste 4 hours of your time and money? You bet the Red Sox want nothing to do with Boras. They are not even talking to Boras about Tek. They are so upset with the way he lied to them and played with them that they are not going to deal with him this year or any year. They will sign Bay to an extension before the summer is over and they are not going to go after Holliday next year. Boras made a very big mistake by treating them like that and he will lose money. You know what? I would do the same thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><input type="button" value="Reply" onclick="CF_Reply('kia');" /><input type="button" value="Quote" onclick="CF_Quote('co_88892','kia');" /></div><span id="co_88892"><p>Lets see what Boras did so far with the Red Sox management in Tex&#8217;s case.<br />
According to Tex himself he made his decision two weeks before Christmas that he wanted to be a Yankee. He said that he always liked the Yankees since he was a young kid. His wife wanted him to be a yankee. She didnt like Boston. She wanted to be closer to her family. All this is a nice story and good for her that she wanted him to be a Yankee. The problem is the Red Sox owner and Theo had no idea. They thought that they were close to sign Tex they flew to Texas thinking that they were going to land him only to find out that Boras wanted more money No word from Boras or Tex that he had no plans of ever going to Red Sox. How you would feel Steve if somebody did this to you? Waste 4 hours of your time and money? You bet the Red Sox want nothing to do with Boras. They are not even talking to Boras about Tek. They are so upset with the way he lied to them and played with them that they are not going to deal with him this year or any year. They will sign Bay to an extension before the summer is over and they are not going to go after Holliday next year. Boras made a very big mistake by treating them like that and he will lose money. You know what? I would do the same thing.</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: butchie22</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2009/01/11/red-sox-done-dealing-with-boras/comment-page-1/#comment-88890</link>
		<dc:creator>butchie22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 03:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waswatching.com/?p=9862#comment-88890</guid>
		<description>From what I had heard, Boras  supposedly talked to Boston BEFORE Drew  opted out. That is patently underhanded BECAUSE Drew was still under contract. 
It is not a stupid claim but probably a true claim. Then again coming from someone who had called  the host (Steve is not a homer BTW) for being a homer and attacking me and BEING WRONG and UNAPOLEGETIC in the process what would one expect?

As for Boras, it would be a better world for the teams if Boras didn&#039;t exist and in some cases even for the players. The Boston brass will nickel and dime Varitek despite the fact that he has been a great captain for the team and was integral to the 2 World Series championships. At this point, they could use Varitek to take another catcher under his wing and have an empty hole in the lineup all at the same time. Epstein and Co are very smart people and it will be interesting to see how they dictate the terms to Boras and Tek as opposed to the other way around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><input type="button" value="Reply" onclick="CF_Reply('butchie22');" /><input type="button" value="Quote" onclick="CF_Quote('co_88890','butchie22');" /></div><span id="co_88890"><p>From what I had heard, Boras  supposedly talked to Boston BEFORE Drew  opted out. That is patently underhanded BECAUSE Drew was still under contract.<br />
It is not a stupid claim but probably a true claim. Then again coming from someone who had called  the host (Steve is not a homer BTW) for being a homer and attacking me and BEING WRONG and UNAPOLEGETIC in the process what would one expect?</p>
<p>As for Boras, it would be a better world for the teams if Boras didn&#8217;t exist and in some cases even for the players. The Boston brass will nickel and dime Varitek despite the fact that he has been a great captain for the team and was integral to the 2 World Series championships. At this point, they could use Varitek to take another catcher under his wing and have an empty hole in the lineup all at the same time. Epstein and Co are very smart people and it will be interesting to see how they dictate the terms to Boras and Tek as opposed to the other way around.</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OnceIWasAYankeeFan</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2009/01/11/red-sox-done-dealing-with-boras/comment-page-1/#comment-88820</link>
		<dc:creator>OnceIWasAYankeeFan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 01:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waswatching.com/?p=9862#comment-88820</guid>
		<description>How did they possibly deal &quot;underhanded&quot; with Boras in the Drew situation?  If the allegations, which were never remotely proven, were actually true, then they informed Boras that Drew should in fact opt out because they guaranteed a significant increase in salary/length of contract.
And that would benefit Boras, since he gets his agent&#039;s cut of each year&#039;s salary.

Its a remarkably stupid claim you are making, Steve.

As for this article, its highly unlikely to be accurate.  They are still talking to him about Varitek, and in the end, I think they&#039;ll get him back on favorable terms, if they decide to hang on to their pitchers and not pay extortionate prices for young catchers filled with potential.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><input type="button" value="Reply" onclick="CF_Reply('OnceIWasAYankeeFan');" /><input type="button" value="Quote" onclick="CF_Quote('co_88820','OnceIWasAYankeeFan');" /></div><span id="co_88820"><p>How did they possibly deal &#8220;underhanded&#8221; with Boras in the Drew situation?  If the allegations, which were never remotely proven, were actually true, then they informed Boras that Drew should in fact opt out because they guaranteed a significant increase in salary/length of contract.<br />
And that would benefit Boras, since he gets his agent&#8217;s cut of each year&#8217;s salary.</p>
<p>Its a remarkably stupid claim you are making, Steve.</p>
<p>As for this article, its highly unlikely to be accurate.  They are still talking to him about Varitek, and in the end, I think they&#8217;ll get him back on favorable terms, if they decide to hang on to their pitchers and not pay extortionate prices for young catchers filled with potential.</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
