• Look, up in the sky! It's a bird! It's a plane! It's a frog!

    ...a frog?

    Not bird, nor plane, nor even frog, it's just a little 'ole baseball blog!

  • What Powers A-Rod

    Posted by on February 11th, 2009 · Comments (3)

    Via Baseball-Reference.com, here’s some pitchers that Alex Rodriguez “owns” in terms of taking them deep, to date in his career:

     Vs. Pitcher	PA	HR
     Bartolo Colon	52	8
     Ramon Ortiz	66	8
     David Wells	77	8
     Tim Wakefield	89	7
     Jamie Moyer	59	6
     Sidney Ponson	73	6
     Jeff Suppan	36	6
     Jar. Washburn	53	6
     Freddy Garcia	41	5
     Ted Lilly     	50	5
     Est. Loaiza	24	5
     TOTAL		620	70
    

    So, if Alex wants to hit like Mark McGwire or Barry Bonds, all he has to do is face these guys for the entire season.

    Yes, I’m joking with this one – although the numbers shown are all true.

    Post to Twitter

    Cashman & General Joe Talk About A-Rod

    Posted by on February 10th, 2009 · Comments (6)

    First, we’ll start with the guy that I like…

    (more…)

    Post to Twitter

    Remember Eric Duncan?

    Posted by on February 10th, 2009 · Comments (3)

    Chad Jennings recently talked to Yankees vice president of baseball operations Mark Newman on a number of topics, including Eric Duncan:

    I also asked about Eric Duncan. Given the wealth of infield options, I asked if Duncan needed to perform well in spring training to continue seeing regular playing time. Newman, though, indicated the Yankees expect to find plenty of at-bats for Duncan.

    “He needs to perform to push himself back into the mix as a major league option,” Newman said. “That’s what he needs to perform for, and I know that’s what he wants to do and that’s what we want him to do. He’s still young, he’s got ability and we’re still working on it.”

    Did you know that the Yankees passed on Carlos Quentin, Adam Jones, Jarrod Saltalamacchia, Scott Baker and Andre Ethier to select Eric Duncan in the 1st round of the 2003 draft? Bummer, huh?

    Post to Twitter

    Ron Darling On A-Rod & Steroids

    Posted by on February 10th, 2009 · Comments (2)

    Ron Darling, on SNY’s Geico SportsNite yesterday, offers thoughts on Alex Rodriguez and using PEDs. Here’s the clip:

    David Cone, John Flaherty and Al Leiter all have their positive qualities, but, man, Darling is soooo good at what he does. This is one department where the Mets have the Yankees beat.

    Post to Twitter

    Wild Thought: Happy Ending For Alex?

    Posted by on February 10th, 2009 · Comments (20)

    In speaking with some fellow Yankees fans, I’m starting to notice that some folks are already starting to build a great deal of sympathy towards Alex Rodriguez with respect to his recent PED situation. They are saying things like “He’s not the only one who used PEDs” and “He’s taking the heat for all 104 players who tested positive in 2003 and that’s not fair” and “He made a mistake and apologized – so now it’s time to move on and support him.”

    And, this leads me to today’s wild thought.

    Suppose that this sympathy movement continues to swell, and, by the time Opening Day comes along, A-Rod’s status with Yankees fans migrates from victim or bad guy to that of hero – via a huge sympathy wave. And, as a result, when Alex takes his first At Bat in the new Yankee Stadium, he gets a standing ovation that lasts for two minutes.

    Would such an event signal to the world that Yankees fans don’t give a rodent’s rectum about what may have gone down in the past with Rodriguez? Yeah, I would think so…and then some.

    Of course, life on the road would be a different story for Alex. But, then again, if he gets “the works” as a visiting player, that could bring cause for Yankees fans to turn it up another notch, at home, in terms of supporting and applauding him. So, in a way, could the whole PED test situation turn out to be a (if you pardon the pun) a “positive” thing for A-Rod when he’s in New York?

    Or, is that just a thought that’s way too wild?

    Post to Twitter

    February 2009 Survey Question #2

    Posted by on February 10th, 2009 · Comments (4)

    Please consider taking the following poll:

    In your opinion, has Alex Rodriguez become a distraction that is detrimental to the Yankees quest for success?
    View Results

    Thanks in advance. And, please feel free to add comments on your opinion in the comments section below.

    Post to Twitter

    WasWatching.com Water Cooler Talk 2/10/09

    Posted by on February 10th, 2009 · Comments (7)

    Feel free to use this post as a place for you to comment on anything Yankees-related (or within reach of tagging the bag of being Yankees-related on a decent slide) today. It could be a casual conversation offering, or, something you saw in the news, or something very detailed that you want to share that’s within the territory of Yankeeland.

    Or, comment on something that someone else has posted here in the comments…

    Have fun. Play nice. And, remember, keep it Yankees-focused.

    Post to Twitter

    A-Rod To Appear Before Congress Now?

    Posted by on February 10th, 2009 · Comments (9)

    Via Jim Baumbach -

    Alex Rodriguez soon might have to repeat his steroid admission on Capitol Hill.

    Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-Md.) plans to recommend to the head of the congressional committee that has previously hosted baseball players that A-Rod receive an invite to testify about his steroid use, Cummings told Newsday last night.

    “I think we’re going to have to see what Rodriguez will tell us,” Cummings said in a phone interview.

    “He is in a confessing mode, so maybe he needs to put his apology into some meaningful action by cooperating with the committee so we can see if there are things we need to reopen to make sure baseball is doing all that it can to rid itself of this kind of practice.”

    I can just see the “A-Perjure” headlines now…

    Post to Twitter

    A-Rod’s PED Confession To Peter Gammons Today

    Posted by on February 9th, 2009 · Comments (7)

    Let’s start with the biggest positive here. Alex Rodriguez confessed today that the report from Saturday was true – and he did use steroids in the past. That was the right thing to do…well, not using the steroids…but, confessing that it was true…and doing it today, just a couple of days after the news broke. Then again, really, what could A-Rod have done given his lack of leverage here? You’ve got four sources confirming that he failed a PED tinkle-test in 2003. Trying to fight that rap would be pretty futile.

    Personally, while it was the right thing to ‘fess up, I think Alex took the chicken’s way out by having a controlled confessional with Peter Gammons. I think it would have taken more guts to get in front of several members of the media, at once, like Andy Pettitte did, and stay there to answer every question – the easy ones and the tough ones – until there were no more questions to be asked. (As it is, A-Rod may have to end up doing this when he reports to Spring Training. And, it will be interesting to see how he handles that situation.)

    Now, on to what Rodriguez said today…that he took PEDs while playing for the Texas Rangers during a three-year period beginning in 2001 – and that’s it. Well, that better be true – because, if he’s withholding anything here, and it comes out later, Pete Rose will look like a saint compared to A-Rod.

    Personally, it would not shock me to hear that Alex started using PEDs back in 1999. There’s some numbers to support such a theory. Further, as I have seen the question posed elsewhere on the ‘net today: A-Rod conveniently started using PEDs immediately after he signed the biggest contract in baseball history? Does that make any sense?

    Oh, that’s right, it was the “culture” in Texas that led him start using…meanwhile, the team that he played for just before that, the Seattle Mariners, were also, reportedly, a merry band of PED-users. But, for some reason, when he was younger, playing in a park not friendly to hitters, working towards his free agency payday, A-Rod was able to plug his ears with bees’ wax and ignore the PED sirens. I dunno…maybe it’s that Texas heat that just makes one susceptible to temptation? Yeah, that’s the ticket.

    Also, it would not shock me to hear that Alex used some form of PED after playing for the Texas Rangers. Sure, as his agent Scott Boras is quick to tell, Rodriguez has been tested several times in the last five years and never came up positive for any banned substances. But, again, they can’t test for everything these days. They don’t test for HGH. And, I’m sure that someone with A-Rod’s disposal income would be able to obtain the cream of the crop, undetectable, designer PEDs that are light-years ahead of what can be tested for…at this moment.

    Let’s pause here for a minute – so that I can ensure that I’m being perfectly clear here. I am not claiming that Alex Rodriguez used PEDs before and/or after the period that he confessed to, today, while he was with the Texas Rangers. More so, I’m just sharing that it would not shock me, all things considered, if it was found out that he did use PEDs while he was in Seattle and/or New York (in addition to his time in Texas).

    Lastly, on this topic, did you notice A-Rod’s response today when Gammons asked him whether his steroid use took place only from 2001 through 2003? Alex’s answer was: “That’s pretty accurate, yes.”

    Hmmm…if that’s not leaving the door open a bit, what is?

    There were other issues with A-Rod’s comments today. For example, does he truly think anyone is going to believe that he wasn’t really sure what he was taking back then? That’s what he said, and, I quote: “Peter, that’s the thing. I mean, again, it was such a loosey-goosey era. I’m guilty for a lot of things. I’m guilty for being arrogant, of being naive, not asking all the right questions. To be quite honest, I don’t know exactly what substance I was guilty of using.”

    Com’on Alex…you make it sound like it was Woodstock and everyone was passing the peace-pipe and you just took a hit with the rest of the gang. Somehow, I find it hard to believe that’s how it all went down.

    Moving along, while I give Alex high marks for confessing albeit tempered because of the delivery method and some vague answers, his attack today on Selena Roberts was a terrible plan on his part. He would have been much better off doing his best Borat impression and saying something like “If Ms. Roberts were here right now, I would say to her ‘Listen pussycat, smile a bit’ and nothing more.”

    The whole smear campaign on Roberts this afternoon makes A-Rod sound like he’s sweating something that’s going to be in her new book (on him) and this was a somewhat preemptive strike.

    In any event, it’s done now. The story has been broken. A-Rod has offered a confession. And, because of this whole mess, the President of our country, during his first prime-time news conference this evening, had to field a question on Alex – and the CIC offered that, when, “you take shortcuts you may end up tarnishing your entire career.”

    And, that’s where A-Rod is today. His career is tarnished. His integrity is to be forever questioned. Think about that for a minute. If Alex hits 55 homeruns this season, many people will wonder if he’s using something that’s beyond detection. If Rodriguez bats .275 with 32 homeruns this season, many people will wonder if he’s been scared straight and this is the A-Rod you get without PEDs. Or, they will wonder if his head is so messed up over the PED situation that he’s now a Jimmy Pearsall case.

    But, Alex brought this all on himself, right? It’s just too bad, as Yankees fans, that we have to watch the whole thing go down in our own backyard.

    Yankees fans can only hope this is the last “A-Rod situation” that they will have to endure. Then again, nine years is an awful long time for Alex to stay out of the news…and, like I said, beware that Selena Roberts book coming this spring…and, of course, beware the fact that the A-Rod PED file has now been opened. It may just not be an open and shut case…even with Alex’s confession to Gammons today.

    Post to Twitter

    The A-Rod PED Confession Is In

    Posted by on February 9th, 2009 · Comments (52)

    Via ESPN -

    His voice shaking at times, Alex Rodriguez met head-on allegations that he tested positive for steroids six years ago, telling ESPN on Monday that he did take performance-enhancing drugs while playing for the Texas Rangers during a three-year period beginning in 2001.

    “When I arrived in Texas in 2001, I felt an enormous amount of pressure, felt all the weight of the world on top of me to perform, and perform at a high level every day,” Rodriguez told ESPN’s Peter Gammons in an interview in Miami Beach, Fla. An extended interview will air on SportsCenter at 6 p.m. ET.

    “Back then, [baseball] was a different culture,” Rodriguez said. “It was very loose. I was young, I was stupid, I was naïve. I wanted to prove to everyone that I was worth being one of the greatest players of all time.

    “I did take a banned substance. For that, I am very sorry and deeply regretful.”

    Rodriguez’s admission comes 48 hours after Sports Illustrated reported that Rodriguez was on a list of 104 players who tested positive for banned substances in 2003, the year when Major League Baseball conducted survey tests to see if mandatory, random drug-testing was needed in the sport.

    He blamed himself and his $252 million contract he signed with the Texas Rangers in 2001 for his decision to use performance-enhancing drugs.

    “Overall, I felt a tremendous pressure to play, and play really well” in Texas, the New York Yankees third baseman said. “I had just signed this enormous contract I felt like I needed something, a push, without over-investigating what I was taking, to get me to the next level.”

    Rodriguez added: “I am sorry for my Texas years. I apologize to the fans of Texas.”

    Rodriguez, who joined the Yankees for the 2004 season after a trade from Texas, said “all my years in New York have been clean.” He also described the recent turn of events as the biggest challenge of his life but added it felt good to be honest about what he’s done in the past.

    I will have commentary on this news later this evening. In the meantime, what do you think of A-Rod’s confession?

    Post to Twitter

    Opinion: Fair Or Not, A-Rod Should Get What He Gets

    Posted by on February 9th, 2009 · Comments (27)

    There’s a segment within the master-set population of baseball fans who now want to suggest that Alex Rodriguez is a victim in all this hubbub about his PED usage in 2003. And, their logic is that the tests conducted in 2003 were confidential, as agreed upon by the MLBPA and MLB, and that the feds/public had no right to see who tested positive or negative, etc. – and it’s “unfair” that this information is now out.

    I get that. In fact, if it I were A-Rod in this situation, I would be extremely angry that my test results were leaked. Further, what it’s worth, I would look into going after the parties that assured me that these tests would be confidential, etc.

    Now, that said, given that the cat is out of the bag, is it “unfair”?

    Well, think about this: Suppose that someone trashed your car. That would be bad. But, the good news here is that the cops have called and shared they knew who did – because they have the guy’s confession on tape.

    Sounds great, right? But, wait, the cops then call you back and say that they forgot to read the guy his Miranda Rights, and, as a result, his confession is not valid – and his statements were ones that no one should have heard…because of the rules around Miranda Rights, etc.

    At that point, as the owner of the car that was trashed, do you really care about the guy’s Miranda Rights? Probably not. At this junction, you want to see the guy pay for what he did to you car.

    And, that’s how I see the thing here with Rodriguez. Was the information obtained in a manner that is questionable? Yes, no question – just like the guy who didn’t get his Miranda Rights. But, now that you know about it, you want to see some sort of justice applied, nonetheless, right?

    So, if some baseball fans want to see A-Rod now held accountable, even if it’s just a Scarlet Letter application, I can understand that – and I don’t believe that Alex should get some kind of buddy-pass here just because the information was supposed to be confidential.

    What do you think?

    Post to Twitter

    WasWatching.com Water Cooler Talk 2/9/09

    Posted by on February 9th, 2009 · Comments (25)

    Feel free to use this post as a place for you to comment on anything Yankees-related (or within reach of tagging the bag of being Yankees-related on a decent slide) today. It could be a casual conversation offering, or, something you saw in the news, or something very detailed that you want to share that’s within the territory of Yankeeland.

    Or, comment on something that someone else has posted here in the comments…

    Have fun. Play nice. And, remember, keep it Yankees-focused.

    Post to Twitter

    A-Rod: What, Me Worry?

    Posted by on February 9th, 2009 · Comments (15)

    Via the Daily News -

    What’s the highest-paid baseball player in history to do when his legacy is on the rocks?

    Party in a tropical paradise, of course.

    Just hours after the steroid-tainted slugger earned his nickname A-Fraud, Alex Rodriguez was drowning his sorrows with Grey Goose and Red Bull in the VIP area at Aura Nightclub in the Bahamas.

    There, the staff takes pride in “treating every guest as a VIP and every VIP as a king.”

    A-Rod certainly wasn’t getting the royal treatment back home – or in the Yankees’ front office.

    One Yankees official said the team has no intention of coming to the party boy’s defense, and general manager Brian Cashman has not returned reporters’ calls, which is no surprise, the official noted.

    “The ball is really in Alex’s court,” the official said, speaking on the condition of anonymity.

    Hal and Hank Steinbrenner spent the weekend at the family’s Ocala Horse Farm in Florida and were talking to team President Randy Levine about the debacle, a source said.

    Team brass are expected to take the position that A-Rod’s positive steroid test doesn’t affect the team because it took place before he joined the Yanks.

    That devastating news seemed hardly on A-Rod’s mind Saturday night as he kicked back in the 70-degree island air with his sexy entourage in tow and a personal butler waiting in his $15,450 suite above.

    Rodriguez avoided any ‘roid rage by staying at the luxurious Atlantis Resort, one of his favorite escapes. He crashed in a two-bedroom suite in the exclusive and lush Cove section of the hotel, complete with private gardens, waterfalls and the butler.

    Hotel staff said A-Rod partied so hard Saturday night that he slept late into the day Sunday before eating and leaving.

    The butler in A-Rod’s suite told reporters that he had gone to a Grammy party for the evening and was not expected back at the hotel Sunday night.

    Nero played the fiddle while Rome burned. I guess A-Rod has to settle for downing Grey Goose and Red Bull cocktails while partying it up in VIP suites in the Bahamas…

    Post to Twitter

    Davidoff: Source Says Yanks Want A-Rod To Clean Own Mess

    Posted by on February 8th, 2009 · Comments (10)

    Via Ken Davidoff -

    The baseball world awaits Alex Rodriguez’s next step, and it will be A-Rod’s move.

    The Yankees, having been rebuffed in their independent efforts to confirm the SI.com report Saturday that A-Rod tested positive for two anabolic steroids in 2003, have no choice but to support baseball’s highest-paid player. But they don’t anticipate being heavily involved in the preparation of any public statements.

    “He’s got to clean up this mess,” a person familiar with the Yankees’ thinking said Sunday. “He’s got the keys to the kingdom. It’s his show.”

    The Yankees’ first full-squad, spring training workout in Tampa, Fla., is Feb. 18, so Rodriguez – who is currently in the Bahamas – could avoid making a statement until then. Yahoo Sports reported that the University of Miami will honor Rodriguez at a dinner Friday.

    I’m not sure if Hazel Burke, Mr. French and Rosie the Robot, combined, could “clean up this mess.” Good luck Alex.

    Post to Twitter

    Verducci On A-Rod & Yankees, Post-Breaking News

    Posted by on February 8th, 2009 · Comments (1)

    Tom Verducci rings on on the A-Rod situation…

    (more…)

    Post to Twitter

    Stats On A-Rod Tell When He Started Getting A Boost?

    Posted by on February 8th, 2009 · Comments (21)

    Some interesting numbers on Alex Rodriguez…where…

    XH/PA = Extra Base Hits per Plate Appearance
    XH/OUTS = Extra Base Hits per Outs Made
    HR/PA = Homeruns per Plate Appearance
    HR/OUTS = Homeruns per Outs Made

    YEAR	XH/PA	XH/OUTS	HR/PA	HR/OUTS
    1996	0.13	0.22	.0532	.0861
    1997	0.10	0.15	.0361	.0528
    1998	0.11	0.16	.0561	.0832
    1999	0.12	0.17	.0734	.1085
    2000	0.11	0.19	.0610	.1015
    2001	0.12	0.19	.0710	.1130
    2002	0.12	0.19	.0786	.1242
    2003	0.12	0.18	.0657	.1042
    2004	0.09	0.14	.0516	.0786
    2005	0.11	0.18	.0671	.1121
    2006	0.09	0.14	.0519	.0803
    2007	0.12	0.20	.0763	.1262
    2008	0.11	0.18	.0589	.0921
    

    Notice that, A-Rod’s XH/PA and XH/OUTS numbers through the years are somewhat steady…around .11 and .18, respectively, each season. So, in terms of getting extra base hits, Rodriguez has been pretty consistent in that department since he’s been a full-time big league hitter.

    However, his HR/PA and HR/OUTS numbers do not show that type of consistency. In fact, they show this pattern:

    A jump up in 1999, from his 1996 through 1998 levels, which is maintained through 2003. And, then a dip in 2004, an increase in 2005, another dip in 2006, another increase in 2007, followed by another dip in 2008.

    Now, this could just be an age thing…as A-Rod turned 23 in 1999 and then was 28 in 2004. Maybe he just matured at 23 and then started to show signs of age when he started to approach 30? It could be…

    Or, maybe, he started using something in 1999 to help some of those doubles and triples (in his steady stream of extra base hits) turn into homeruns, and, kept using it until 2003? And, then, come 2004, thanks to the MLB PED policy, he stopped using it…until he used it again in 2005 (to get the New York fans and media off his back for a sub par 2004) and then he used it again in 2007 (to have a huge year in his opt out season)?

    Now, keep in mind that this supposition above is 100% conjecture and not based on any hard evidence. If Roger Murtaugh were to read this, he would probably say “Pretty thin, huh?” and Martin Riggs would surely answer “Anorexic.”

    But, if, somehow, it’s proven that Alex started using PEDs back in 1999, it would then explain some of these numbers…to an extent. What do you think?

    Post to Twitter

    Bruney Backs A-Rod

    Posted by on February 8th, 2009 · Comments (5)

    Via Mark Feinsand -

    While the team’s front office had nothing to say about Sports Illustrated’s report that A-Rod failed a drug test in 2003, Yankees reliever Brian Bruney threw all of his support behind his teammate.

    “We’re all very supportive of all our teammates,” Bruney said. “Alex has no reason to do anything like that. I’ve seen firsthand – as I’m sure everyone has – how hard Alex works. I don’t believe it. That’s where I stand. I honestly don’t believe it.”

    “It’s unfortunate that something like this comes out with no backbone on it,” Bruney said. “Alex, honestly, is the hardest worker I’ve ever seen in any sport. It’s pretty impressive to see how he works and takes care of himself, what he eats. He’s kind of like a robot. He already is the best player to ever play this game, in my opinion, and he would have no reason to do anything like that.”

    “In the clubhouse, we all love Alex and we support everything he does,” Bruney said. “I know I’m glad he’s on my team, that’s for sure.”

    …It’s pretty impressive to see how he works and takes care of himself, what he eats. He’s kind of like a robot…

    Isn’t that what everyone used to say in defense of Barry Bonds?

    Post to Twitter

    Two That I Would Love To Hear From Today

    Posted by on February 8th, 2009 · Comments (14)

    Has anyone heard anything yet from Suzyn Waldman or Michael Kay on the A-Rod news? I would love to see someone track them down, now, for a comment.

    Is Kay doing his ESPN Radio Show on Monday? Should be good, there’s no way that he can ignore this one, right?

    Post to Twitter

    Boras: A-Rod Will Issue A Statement

    Posted by on February 8th, 2009 · Comments (8)

    He’s just not saying when. Via the AP -

    Major League Baseball and the players union issued statements Saturday, refusing to confirm or deny the report on Rodriguez, citing player confidentiality.

    Scott Boras, Rodriguez’s agent, said Saturday that Rodriguez was out of the country but would issue a response “as we go forward.” SI.com reported that, when it asked for comment, Rodriguez said: “You’ll have to talk to the union.”

    According to sources, A-Rod is in the Bahamas.

    Now, what’s interesting here is that Selena Roberts approached A-Rod, to talk to him about this story, last Thursday at a gym in Miami. Is it just me, or, did Alex get his rear-end out of the country as fast as possible once he heard this whole thing was on the verge of breaking?

    Post to Twitter

    Could A-Rod Have Been Using PEDs As A Mariner?

    Posted by on February 8th, 2009 · Comments (19)

    Well, it seems like some guys in Seattle, back then, were using. From a Mike Fish ESPN.com report back in December 2007:

    Most big leaguers and recent baseball retirees have been scrambling to distance themselves from the Mitchell report. Some have called on their agents or used a neatly crafted statement to explain away their performance-enhancing drug use. But here comes Shane Monahan out of nowhere to confess, unsolicited, his past misdeeds.

    Monahan, now 33 and living with his family in Vail, Colo., openly admits to being a juiced player in baseball’s steroids era.

    He says he used anabolic steroids when he played for the Mariners. He says Deca-Durabolin and Winstrol were his primary enhancers. He says he got them from “guys” who regularly hung around the clubhouse. And he says he regularly used amphetamines, better known around baseball as energy-boosting “greenies.”

    Monahan says he began taking steroids late in the 1998 season.

    “I saw what kind of money it is going to get you,” he says. “I had great minor league seasons, but I wanted to stay in the big leagues. I know my teammates and I know guys on other teams are doing it, and they’re hitting home runs left and right. And I’m sitting there going, ‘All right, well, what I’m going to do?’

    “I read up on it. I learned how to use it. I started lifting weights and I went from like 190 pounds to 215. I mean, muscles on my body where I didn’t know you had muscles. I already ran fast. I could hit. I had a good arm. But all of a sudden now, recovery time felt better. Everything was a lot better.”

    The one-time fringe major leaguer turned to the dark side, he says, partly because he believed that steroids were rampant throughout the Mariners’ clubhouse and the game. If that’s what it took to level the playing field, he was willing to try them.

    During his brief time in Seattle, Monahan came to believe steroid use was widespread in the Mariners’ clubhouse, although he refuses to identify those he suspects were using. The Mitchell report identified a handful of players whose tenures overlapped with his in Seattle, including Ryan Franklin, Glenallen Hill, David Segui and Todd Williams.

    Monahan says that back then, Major League Baseball had yet to tighten access to clubhouses, and that many players regularly worked out with their personal trainers while using team facilities.

    Sources for steroids and amphetamines, he says, floated freely through the Seattle clubhouse. They were friends of team members who, at the time, had access to the players’ sanctuary. He remembers paying cash, and even bartered baseball gear, for steroids and amphetamines.

    “There were two or three guys,” he says of the suppliers, though he says he is unable to recall their names. “You’d go up to them and say, ‘Hey, I need some greenies. What is it going to take?’ Well, it might be 100 bucks here. It is a jersey here, or a dozen baseballs and two bats. And you’d give it to him.”

    If what Monahan said here is true, now that the A-Rod usage (in 2003) story has come to light, you have to wonder if someone from that Mariners’ scene in the late 1990′s will now come out of the woods and say that they have more about Alex and PEDs, dating back to when he was in Seattle.

    Post to Twitter

    Cashman Talks About Sabathia & Burnett

    Posted by on February 8th, 2009 · Comments (1)

    Great piece from Kat O’Brien today in Newsday – where she gets Cashman to comment on CC and A.J.

    Here are some highlights:

    Add Sabathia and Burnett to two-time 19-game winner Chien-Ming Wang (whom the Yankees desperately hope is healthy), Andy Pettitte and Joba Chamberlain, and the Yankees’ rotation looks ready to match up with anyone’s.

    “We’ve got four guys we pretty much feel that we can count on [if healthy],” general manager Brian Cashman said in a phone interview.

    “I do think that Sabathia’s one of the best pitchers in the game – he’s proved that over the last few years,” Cashman said. “A.J. Burnett led the American League in strikeouts [231]. We know what Wang can do, we know what Andy Pettitte can do, so there’s a little bit of certainty if they’re healthy.

    “Last year, we had two starters that we knew what we were getting, Wang and Pettitte. We weren’t sure about [Mike] Mussina and we hoped for more from the two kids [Phil Hughes and Ian Kennedy].”

    For Cashman, it was less a matter of preferring Sabathia over Santana than the lower cost of obtaining Sabathia, at least in terms of players. It would have cost the Yankees a hefty trade package plus a hefty new contract or contract extension to get Santana. They watched as he went to the Mets, hoping Sabathia would accept their many millions a year later as a free agent. And he did.

    “I think they’re very comparable,” Cashman said. “They were going head-to-head in the American League. They’re two of the upper-echelon players in the game, period. That’s why they got the contracts that they got.”

    The five-year, $82.5-million signing of Burnett was not as universally lauded as the Sabathia contract, with some even comparing it to the Carl Pavano signing four years ago because of Burnett’s injury history. But the 32-year-old has been almost unhittable at times, particularly against the Yankees. He has won more than 12 games just once in his career, though – when he went 18-10 in 2008.

    “That’s a fact,” Cashman said of Burnett’s stints on the disabled list. “He’s a high-risk, high-reward guy. He’s a guy that has had some injuries, but when he is healthy, he’s as tough as they come. It’s a fair thing [to question his signing], but we didn’t blow the market away. The Atlanta Braves were right there with us.”

    One factor that weighed in Burnett’s favor was just how badly Yankees players – who hated batting against him – wanted him as a teammate. They wanted Sabathia, too, but that was a no-brainer.

    “This is a guy that our players wanted desperately,” Cashman said of Burnett. “They felt that this guy was a difference-maker. Guys kept banging on my door [after] we had Sabathia in the fold – Alex [Rodriguez], Johnny [Damon]. It was a full-court press. You wouldn’t believe the calls I got over him. It was very unusual.”

    For Cashman’s sake, Burnett better have some return on that investment. If not, he’ll be another log on the Pavano/Igawa fire…

    Post to Twitter

    Kay Told To Go Get A Room

    Posted by on February 8th, 2009 · Comments (2)

    Just saw this one from Neil Best on Friday -

    Two months before the Yankees move into a new stadium, their TV voice has “no idea” where he will do his day job on game days.

    In recent years, Michael Kay’s 1050 ESPN show has originated from a trailer outside the stadium because CBS Radio will not permit him to set up inside. It owns both the Yankees’ radio rights and WFAN, 1050′s competitor, and has the power to bar other stations’ shows from the building.

    Kay said logistics at the new stadium won’t allow for a trailer, so he is not sure where he will be until 6, when he leaves for the YES booth.

    “They’ve always said we’re not a threat to them and they don’t worry about us,” Kay said. “There is nothing I gain from doing the show in the stadium other than for me personally, it’s easier … They’ve been petty and vindictive about it from the beginning.”

    ESPN bars its personalities from being guests on WFAN. Three industry sources said WFAN offered to lift the stadium ban if ESPN lifted its guest restriction. ESPN declined.

    WFAN operations manager Mark Chernoff declined to comment.

    But, he’s Michael Kay!

    Post to Twitter

    The First 1,820 Days Of A-Rod In Pinstripes

    Posted by on February 7th, 2009 · Comments (10)

    On February 14, 2004, Yankees G.M. Brian Cashman swung a trade to acquire Alex “A-Rod” Rodriguez from the Texas Rangers. And, on February 7, 2009, it was reported that (in spite of claims in the recent past from A-Rod that he never used, or considered using, performance-enhancing drugs) Alex Rodriguez tested positive in 2003 for having two anabolic steroids (in his system).

    In a period just one week short of five years, the Yankees’ “A-Rod Story” has taken an interesting turn, huh?

    On the plus side, in his Yankees career, to date, A-Rod has come to the park, just about everyday, ready to play ball. According to FanGraphs.com, from 2004 through 2008, including the post-season, Alex has hit 1,000 groundballs – how about that for a nice round number? – and I’m pretty sure that he’s run everyone of them out, hard. And, by the way, he won the league MVP award in 2005 and 2007. Geez, what’s not to like about all that?

    Well, there’s been some other events during A-Rod’s Yankees career too – between the time the Yankees traded for him and today (when the news came out about his reported usage of illegal steroids). Here’s a summary of some of that stuff:

    July 2004: A-Rod gets into a fight with Red Sox catcher Jason Varitek – which many claim became a season rallying event for Boston that year.

    October 2004: A-Rod tries to slap the ball out of Boston’s Bronson Arroyo’s glove and is ruled out for interference during Game 6 of the ALCS.

    October 2005: A-Rod bats .133 in the ALDS.

    November 2005: A-Rod is cautioned by the New York Yankees that playing poker in illegal clubs could be dangerous and harmful to his image.

    December 2005: A-Rod creates a bunch of drama regarding which team he will play for in the World Baseball Classic.

    September 2006: An embarrasing feature on A-Rod, where he is spoken of negatively by other Yankees, appears in Sports Illustrated.

    October 2006: A-Rod bats .071 in the ALDS.

    November 2006: A-Rod stands up Yogi Berra at a charity event.

    February 2007: A-Rod holds a press conference where he says that he and Derek Jeter have been “lying” about having a great relationship.

    May 2007: A-Rod is caught cheating on his wife with a muscular stripper.

    May 2007: A-Rod yelled “Mine!” or “Ha!” (or something like that) as Blue Jays third baseman Howie Clark tried to catch a Jorge Posada pop fly with two out – causing the ball to drop in and annoying the heck out of the Toronto players.

    July 2007: A-Rod’s wife wears a shirt to a game at Yankee Stadium which contains an obscene word.

    October 2007: A-Rod strikes out 6 times in 15 At Bats during the ALDS.

    October 2007: During the World Series, A-Rod opts out of his Yankees contract.

    July 2008: A-Rod is caught having an affair with Madonna – leading to a divorce with his wife and many tabloid headlines.

    July 2008: A-Rod leaves Yankee Stadium before the completion of the 2008 All-Star game – and catches some heat for not sticking around.

    And, that’s just the list of A-Rod related embarrasing things that I can remember, as of this moment. There’s an excellent chance that I missed a few.

    So, this all said…whaddaya say Yankees fans…when you look back at the first 1,820 days of A-Rod in pinstripes, factoring it all in, has it been worth it?

    Post to Twitter

    Report: Alex Rodriguez Tested Positive For Steroids In 2003

    Posted by on February 7th, 2009 · Comments (30)

    I just turned on the MLB Network and saw Tom Verducci talking about this in a Breaking News segment…

    My thanks to those who left comments here in other entries, also alerting me of this…

    Here’s the scoop from SI.com -

    In 2003, when he won the American League home run title and the AL Most Valuable Player award as a shortstop for the Texas Rangers, Alex Rodriguez tested positive for two anabolic steroids, four sources have independently told Sports Illustrated.

    Rodriguez’s name appears on a list of 104 players who tested positive for performance-enhancing drugs in Major League Baseball’s ’03 survey testing, SI’s sources say. As part of a joint agreement with the MLB Players Association, the testing was conducted to determine if it was necessary to impose mandatory random drug testing across the major leagues in 2004.

    When approached by an SI reporter on Thursday at a gym in Miami, Rodriguez declined to discuss his 2003 test results. “You’ll have to talk to the union,” said Rodriguez, the Yankees’ third baseman since his trade to New York in February 2004. When asked if there was an explanation for his positive test, he said, “I’m not saying anything.”

    Phone messages left by SI for players’ union executive director Donald Fehr were not returned.

    Wow. If true, Jose Canseco was right again. And, all of a sudden, the Joe Torre book doesn’t seem like the biggest news in Yankeeland any more…

    Update, 12 noon EST, 2/7/09: How many times do you think this video clip will be replayed in the next 24 hours?

    Post to Twitter

    Cashman: “A-Fraud” Just Another Thing For A-Rod

    Posted by on February 7th, 2009 · Comments (7)

    Via Mark Feinsand -

    Cashman, who has remained relatively quiet about the contents of Joe Torre’s book, has spoken with his superstar third baseman about the “A-Fraud” firestorm created by the release of Torre’s “The Yankee Years,” and the general manager isn’t worried about Rodriguez’s ability to cast the controversy aside and focus on baseball.

    “He’s fine,” Cashman said. “It’s something he’s going to have to deal with.”

    Cashman has spoken to Rodriguez several times throughout the winter, which is not unusual for them. The GM said he didn’t reach out to A-Rod specifically to address Torre’s book, though the topic came up during a recent conversation.

    “He’s already dealt with stuff like this way too many times,” Cashman said of the “A-Fraud” fallout. “It’s just another thing for him to swat out of the way.”

    …It’s just another thing for him to swat out of the way…

    How cool would it be to have a full 12-month period, or longer, where A-Rod doesn’t have “another thing” to deal with?

    Post to Twitter

    Young & Old Yankees Bloggers Share Thoughts

    Posted by on February 7th, 2009 · Comments (4)

    The Yankees’ 2009 season will be the fifth one that I’ve covered here at WasWatching.com. And, if you’ve been paying attention during that time, you know how long I’ve been a fan of the team and what my thoughts are regarding the last half-decade of Yankees play.

    Thinking about this, to myself, I wondered about some other Yankees bloggers and web-analysts. How long have they been fans of the team? What are their thoughts about the Yankees since 2004? So, I recently asked a few of them the following questions:

    Q1: How old were you when the Yankees last won a ring in 2000? Were you:

    a): 19 years old or younger
    b): Between the ages of 20 and 28
    c): Age 29 or older

    Q2: How would you describe the state of the Yankees over the the last five years?

    I reached out to about 30 Yankees blogger-types and 15 responded. Amazingly, there were none from the “were between the ages of 20 and 28 when the Yankees last won a ring in 2000″ group among those to get back to me. It was just the “young” group “a” above and the “old” group “c” above. And, here’s what they had to say…

    (more…)

    Post to Twitter

    Has Yanks’ Competition Risen Or Have Yanks Fallen?

    Posted by on February 6th, 2009 · Comments (2)

    Something Tom Verducci said to Alex Belth the other day has stuck with me. Here it is:

    The Yankees helped raise the competition because they were so good. [Billy] Beane, in fact, compared those championship-winning Yankees teams to the UCLA basketball dynasty — so good as to make moot his crapshoot theory about the playoffs. And then the competition improved because of systematic and philosophical changes across the industry (increased revenue sharing, statistical analysis, ownership changes, etc.). I believe, for instance, these days teams that miss the playoffs are better than, say, the Rangers teams the Yankees were sweeping just about every year in the Division Series. So the closer the competitive gap is narrowed, the more “luck” will come into play. And more specifically, the Red Sox leveraged their cutting edge smarts on player evaluation to acquire on the cheap many of the players who pushed them past the Yankees in 2004 (Ortiz, Millar, Mueller, etc.)

    Is this true? Has the Yankees competition improved? Well, thanks to the situational record won-loss data available at Baseball-Reference.com, we can look into this question.

    The chart below shows us, from 1996 through 2008, how many games the Yankees played against teams who would finish the year with a winning percentage of .525 or better, how many of those games the Yankees won, how many games the Yankees played against teams who would finish the year with a winning percentage of .550 or better, and how many of those games the Yankees won:

    	>= .525		>=.550
    Year	Games 	Wins	Games	Wins
    1996	75	40	24	14
    1997	43	18	29	10
    1998	64	38	16	10
    1999	53	29	43	23
    2000	63	32	50	25
    2001	39	16	27	11
    2002	56	33	56	33
    2003	78	43	44	25
    2004	58	31	46	24
    2005	54	29	45	22
    2006	84	45	34	18
    2007	63	34	39	22
    2008	90	48	46	23
    

    The first thing that jumps out, to me, here is the 2001 season. Wow, did the Yankees have a soft schedule that year, or what?

    But, getting back to the Verducci point, the data suggests that it’s a valid one for consideration.

    In terms of playing “really good teams” – ones that finished the season with a winning percentage of .550 or better – the numbers for the Yankees do show an increase with time.

    From 1996 through 2001, the Yankees averaged about 32 games played against these “really good teams.” And, from 2002 through 2005, New York averaged about 48 games played against “really good teams.” Lastly, from 2006 through 2008, the Yankees averaged about 40 games played against “really good teams.”

    So, you could claim, from 1996 through 2001, the Yankees played about 30 games a season against “really good teams” whereas, from 2002 through 2008, the Yankees played about 45 games a season against “really good teams.” And, that’s an increase of 50%.

    Next, look at the data in terms of playing “good teams” – ones that finished the season with a winning percentage of .525 or better – the numbers for the Yankees here also tell a story.

    From 1996 through 2001, the Yankees averaged about 56 games played against these “good teams.” And, from 2002 through 2005, New York averaged about 62 games played against “good teams.” Lastly, from 2006 through 2008, the Yankees averaged about 79 games played against “good teams.”

    So, you could claim, from 1996 through 2005, the Yankees played about 60 games a season against “good teams” whereas, from 2006 through 2008, the Yankees played about 80 games a season against “good teams.” And, that’s an increase of 33%.

    Looking at this data, if asked the question “Has the Yankees competition improved?,” one might want to answer “Yes.” Look at the numbers. In the last seven seasons, the Yankees have faced more “really good teams” than in the six seasons prior, each year. And, in the last three seasons, the Yankees have faced more “good teams” than in the ten seasons prior, each year.

    But, the one question I have here is this: Have the Yankees raised the bar, and other teams have now matched it; or, is this more a matter of the Yankees lowering the bar which has enabled other teams to raise their bar?

    From 2002 through 2004, the Yankees were good for 100 wins each season. But, from 2005 through 2007, the Yankees were good for 95 wins, thereabouts, each season. And, last year, the Yankees won “only” 89 games.

    Therefore, are the records for Yankees opponents better in the last few years because they’re getting better; or, are their opponents’ records getting better because the Yankees are getting worse and allowing them to win more games?

    It’s probably something that can be debated, debated some more, and then debated again. It’s the chicken and the egg argument, in some ways.

    Post to Twitter

    Sherman: 21 Months Till D-Day On Jeter

    Posted by on February 6th, 2009 · Comments (21)

    Via Joel Sherman -

    Keep these facts in mind: The first season of a new contract would be 2011, Jeter’s age-37 season. No team has won it all with a shortstop that old, and only one (the 1956 Dodgers with Pee Wee Reese) even reached the World Series.

    Just two shortstops 37 or older (Honus Wagner and Luke Appling) have generated an OPS greater than .800 (minimum 300 plate appearances), and it was last done by Appling 60 years ago.

    And how about his defense? Every statistical evaluation shows Jeter’s range to consistently be among the majors’ worst, and the scouting community pretty much confirms that.

    By 2011, the Yanks could have either Jeter or just his future plaque at Monument Park play short; they will have about the same range.

    As Sherman notes in the feature, it becomes even more complicated – beyond the dollars and performance levels – when you figure that Derek Jeter will probably be about 60 hits shy of 3,000 career hits as he heads into the 2011 season.

    Can you imagine Jeter getting his 3,000th hit with some team other than the Yankees?

    Post to Twitter

    MLB Supports Joe Torre’s Book

    Posted by on February 6th, 2009 · Comments (2)

    Crazy? Not really, why else would MLB allow for a one-hour Joe Torre interview with Bob Costas to air yesterday on their MLB Network?

    You think if Jim Bouton’s Ball Four came out today, for the first time, that Bud Selig would allow Costas to interview Jim, for an hour, in prime-time, about the book?

    Or, if the MLB Network had been around when Jose Canseco’s Juiced had come out, do you think baseball would have been willing to help Canseco promote the book by granting him a one-hour special interview on their network?

    Granted, the fact that Tom Verducci works for the MLB Network and the fact that Bob Costas was probably looking to make a splash now that he’s joined the network, probably helped to grease the wheel on this one. But, if baseball really had a problem with Torre’s book, do you really think this interview on their network would have been allowed?

    Oh, and, Joe Torre and Bud Selig being long-time friends probably didn’t hurt this from happening too.

    Anyone else find it interesting that the MLB Network basically gave Torre a one-hour commercial for his book yesterday? Think the Yankees were happy about that?

    Post to Twitter

    WasWatching.com Water Cooler Talk 2/6/09

    Posted by on February 6th, 2009 · Comments (5)

    Feel free to use this post as a place for you to comment on anything Yankees-related (or within reach of tagging the bag of being Yankees-related on a decent slide) today. It could be a casual conversation offering, or, something you saw in the news, or something very detailed that you want to share that’s within the territory of Yankeeland.

    Or, comment on something that someone else has posted here in the comments…

    Have fun. Play nice. And, remember, keep it Yankees-focused.

    Post to Twitter

    « Previous PageNext Page »