WasWatching.com Water Cooler Talk 5/21/09

Posted by Steve Lombardi on May 21st, 2009 · Comments (24)

Click here for more information about this entry.

Comments on WasWatching.com Water Cooler Talk 5/21/09

  1. MJ
    May 21st, 2009 | 10:32 am

    Peavy to White Sox seems imminent. I wonder how he’ll do in the hitter-friendly ballpark in Chicago and in the AL.

  2. Corey
    May 21st, 2009 | 10:38 am

    I’m not impressed with Peavy in all the times I’ve seen him, granted its few and far between, but I feel like they woulda been better off keeping Javy at that point…I guess we’ll see

  3. yagottagotomo1
    May 21st, 2009 | 10:38 am

    Steve, I could not find contact info, so I will just post it here. I am having a lot of trouble posting comments- I can post, but from the time I click submit, it takes anywhere from 45 seconds to 2 and a half minutes for the comment to actually submit. Is this problem on my end? have you heard of this before? This has been happening for about a month now, at least.

  4. Corey
    May 21st, 2009 | 10:41 am

    @ yagottagotomo1:
    FWIW, commenting works fine for me

  5. OnceIWasAYankeeFan
    May 21st, 2009 | 10:42 am

    First off, congrats to my Yankee friends on the hot streak. Its certainly cause for concern on the other side when you play well AND luck has been on your side, too (not being derogatory, just observing that a streak like three walk-offs in a row has to involve a measure of luck). Got a question for you guys:

    How disconcerting is it to realize that at the current homer pace, home runs hit would exceed the total number of home runs hit all of last year at Yankee Stadium II on July 18th? And that’s the date I read a day or two ago, before the latest “bombs” went out. Considering that hitters usually get hotter with the weather, and balls fly further in warmer weather, I can’t see how you avoid an increase in the homer rate going forward.

    Are you confident enough in the pitching to believe the team will be successful in this home environment?

  6. yagottagotomo1
    May 21st, 2009 | 10:46 am

    OnceIWasAYankeeFan wrote:

    How disconcerting is it to realize that at the current homer pace, home runs hit would exceed the total number of home runs hit all of last year at Yankee Stadium II on July 18th? And that’s the date I read a day or two ago, before the latest “bombs” went out. Considering that hitters usually get hotter with the weather, and balls fly further in warmer weather, I can’t see how you avoid an increase in the homer rate going forward.

    Are you confident enough in the pitching to believe the team will be successful in this home environment?

    Two points. Firstly, the dimensions are fine in left and center, and the ball is leaving there at a normal pace. The problem is in right field, where the wall in some places is 9 feet shorter. It seems like it should not make a difference, but a look at hittracker.com will show that anywhere from 12 to 15 of the home runs hit to right may not have been out in the old park. They need to move the wall pack, even if it costs them two rows of seats.

    The second point is, both teams have to play by those conditions. So why would I think it would hurt the Yankees more than the opposition?

  7. OnceIWasAYankeeFan
    May 21st, 2009 | 10:55 am

    Well for one thing, weak relievers will blow up games easier if they prove succeptible to the long ball at home.

    It all comes back to pitching with these conditions. You’ll probably pound the weak rotations, but when you face the good pitching staffs, will you get the pitching to keep the ball in the yard if the other team is doing the same thing?

    So many parks have been built with offense in mind in the last generation. How many have hosted a World Champion? Obviously the Phils last year, but is there anyone else? Pitching to large dimensions with good defense has been a better path to winning than playing in a bandbox. That’s why I think the Marlins are being smart, designing a new stadium with pitching in mind, not offense. And you might have noticed, the Marlins won a couple of championships without the prediliction for bombs at their stadium.

  8. yagottagotomo1
    May 21st, 2009 | 11:04 am

    OnceIWasAYankeeFan wrote:

    It all comes back to pitching with these conditions. You’ll probably pound the weak rotations, but when you face the good pitching staffs, will you get the pitching to keep the ball in the yard if the other team is doing the same thing?

    I think they need one more reliever to step up. Outside of that, yes, I do believe that the Yankees have good enough pitching to match-up.

  9. Sicilian Lou
    May 21st, 2009 | 11:05 am

    Corey wrote:

    I’m not impressed with Peavy in all the times I’ve seen him, granted its few and far between, but I feel like they woulda been better off keeping Javy at that point…I guess we’ll see

    I agree with Corey here.. Last year I did a look up on Peavy’s numbers against the AL.. Surprisingly, he has only one pitched well against the KC Royal.. As far as the mighty beast division the AL EAST.. Well, his only win came against the Jays at home.. He has never beaten the Yankees, Red Sox nor Baltimore… he never pitched against the Rays.. So, until his stats dictate other.. I will say he is more of a product of the WEAK NL West than a dominating pitcher like most think…

  10. G.I. Joey
    May 21st, 2009 | 11:07 am

    OnceIWasAYankeeFan wrote:

    It all comes back to pitching with these conditions. You’ll probably pound the weak rotations, but when you face the good pitching staffs, will you get the pitching to keep the ball in the yard if the other team is doing the same thing?

    I think we will, our starting pitching is only getting better. As for our weaker bullpen, expect a bit of a boost with the return of Bruney and Aceves establishing himself as the go-to long reliever.

  11. Corey
    May 21st, 2009 | 11:08 am

    i’m not sure what ur point is, the World Champion in 4 out of the last 5 years has played in a hitters park…

  12. Raf
    May 21st, 2009 | 11:11 am

    OnceIWasAYankeeFan wrote:

    That’s why I think the Marlins are being smart, designing a new stadium with pitching in mind, not offense. And you might have noticed, the Marlins won a couple of championships without the prediliction for bombs at their stadium.

    Meanwhile, the Tigers haven’t been as successful…

  13. Pat F
    May 21st, 2009 | 11:11 am

    steven – please write a post everyday about swisher’s numbers. every time you do, he goes downtown that night! on april 28th you wrote this post http://waswatching.com/2009/04/28/the-swisher-time-bomb-is-ready-to-blow/ and swisher went 2 for 3 with a jack (and 2 for 5 with 2 jacks the next night). then yesterday’s post followed by last night’s results. it should be a requirement of waswatching.com to post about swisher with negative overtones reminding us of your stand and how you’ve warned us everyday!

  14. MJ
    May 21st, 2009 | 11:55 am

    Raf wrote:

    OnceIWasAYankeeFan wrote:
    That’s why I think the Marlins are being smart, designing a new stadium with pitching in mind, not offense. And you might have noticed, the Marlins won a couple of championships without the prediliction for bombs at their stadium.
    Meanwhile, the Tigers haven’t been as successful…

    Nor have the Mariners, Giants or Padres, all of whom play in pitcher’s parks.

  15. Pat F
    May 21st, 2009 | 12:04 pm

    red sox have won 2 in last 5 years playing in a little league field. you can win in any type of park, and i don’t think any is better or worse for winning than another. could be wrong on that.

  16. May 21st, 2009 | 1:25 pm

    yagottagotomo1 wrote:

    I am having a lot of trouble posting comments- I can post, but from the time I click submit, it takes anywhere from 45 seconds to 2 and a half minutes for the comment to actually submit. Is this problem on my end? have you heard of this before? This has been happening for about a month now, at least.

    News to me. Anyone else having this issue?

  17. Raf
    May 21st, 2009 | 1:47 pm

    Steve Lombardi wrote:

    News to me. Anyone else having this issue?

    I haven’t had a problem, I’ve posted in IE, Firefox & Opera with no problem

  18. yagottagotomo1
    May 21st, 2009 | 2:11 pm

    I’m using Safari. I does not happen every time- it comes and goes. It is not my internet connection, which works just fine during those times, so I’m not sure what it might be.

  19. Corey
    May 21st, 2009 | 2:17 pm

    it certainly could be safari…JavaScript does not have an industry standard like programming languages do, so each browser interprets things differently, depending on the company who wrote it. That’s why when your a web developer, you have to test your code on every browser (and many times, multiple versions of each browser) in order to get things right…this is why I became a programmer and not a web developer :)

  20. Corey
    May 21st, 2009 | 2:18 pm

    does anyone else who uses Safari experience any problems?

  21. MJ
    May 21st, 2009 | 4:34 pm

    h/t to LoHud, this is tonight’s lineup for the game I’m going to:

    Derek Jeter SS
    Robinson Cano 2B
    Mark Teixeira 1B
    Alex Rodriguez 3B
    Hideki Matsui DH
    Nick Swisher RF
    Melky Cabrera LF
    Francisco Cervelli C
    Brett Gardner CF

    UGH! Melky AND Gardner in the same lineup? That’s what RLYW used to call “house-money” lineup. I gotta say, for the $150 I paid for tonight’s game, I’d rather not see this horrid 7-8-9…

  22. yagottagotomo1
    May 21st, 2009 | 5:50 pm

    Melky is far from horrid. He has a better OPS than Cano, Matsui, and Jeter. Right now, he is playing great. Let’s hope it lasts.

  23. Evan3457
    May 21st, 2009 | 10:17 pm

    That “house-money” lineup broke it open early, and 9 is….just fine.

    Just for Steve’s reference: Naughty Number Nine

  24. Evan3457
    May 21st, 2009 | 10:18 pm

    Oh, got a reasonably not-that-expensive ticket for tomorrow’s 1st game of the Phillies’ series. Hope to have to use all my fingers to add up the streak by the end of it.

Leave a reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.