<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Not Us?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://waswatching.com/2009/07/12/why-not-us/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://waswatching.com/2009/07/12/why-not-us/</link>
	<description>Holy Cow! We never take cannoli from a huckleberry.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 22:39:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Game#88: Yankees at Angels. Last game before the All-Star break&#8230; &#124; The Voice of Yankees Universe</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2009/07/12/why-not-us/comment-page-1/#comment-217962</link>
		<dc:creator>Game#88: Yankees at Angels. Last game before the All-Star break&#8230; &#124; The Voice of Yankees Universe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 18:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waswatching.com/?p=15291#comment-217962</guid>
		<description>[...] Why Not Us? / Shelley Duncan retires from Twitter / The Joba dilemma [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why Not Us? / Shelley Duncan retires from Twitter / The Joba dilemma [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: butchie22</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2009/07/12/why-not-us/comment-page-1/#comment-217959</link>
		<dc:creator>butchie22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 17:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waswatching.com/?p=15291#comment-217959</guid>
		<description>One can use the matchup excuse for the Yankees but look at what happened in 2004 with Boston and  2006 with Detroit where the Yankees traditionally had an edge over those teams. Could it be that the Yankees are ill constructed for a short series relative to their counterparts? I could could pick Raf&#039;s concept of usual suspects, but the Phightin&#039; Phils only had reentered the playoffs in 2007 after years of almost making it, so it is dubitable whether or not they are a usual suspect. The New York Mess(sic), they only appeared in the playoffs once since 2000, far from a yearly appearance I might say!

There is parity no doubt about it BUT the Yanks haven&#039;t excelled in the playoffs the last few years. I find it trublesome that CC is just OK in the playoffs, AJ has never pitched in the playoffs, Wang is either mediocre OR terrible, and Andy has been good in the post season BUT is Andy on the decline? That is something which in constructing this team, Cash Man might have yet again made a team that could win 95-100 during the regular season BUT maybe not make it past the first round again.........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><input type="button" value="Reply" onclick="CF_Reply('butchie22');" /><input type="button" value="Quote" onclick="CF_Quote('co_217959','butchie22');" /></div><span id="co_217959"><p>One can use the matchup excuse for the Yankees but look at what happened in 2004 with Boston and  2006 with Detroit where the Yankees traditionally had an edge over those teams. Could it be that the Yankees are ill constructed for a short series relative to their counterparts? I could could pick Raf&#8217;s concept of usual suspects, but the Phightin&#8217; Phils only had reentered the playoffs in 2007 after years of almost making it, so it is dubitable whether or not they are a usual suspect. The New York Mess(sic), they only appeared in the playoffs once since 2000, far from a yearly appearance I might say!</p>
<p>There is parity no doubt about it BUT the Yanks haven&#8217;t excelled in the playoffs the last few years. I find it trublesome that CC is just OK in the playoffs, AJ has never pitched in the playoffs, Wang is either mediocre OR terrible, and Andy has been good in the post season BUT is Andy on the decline? That is something which in constructing this team, Cash Man might have yet again made a team that could win 95-100 during the regular season BUT maybe not make it past the first round again&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raf</title>
		<link>http://waswatching.com/2009/07/12/why-not-us/comment-page-1/#comment-217957</link>
		<dc:creator>Raf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 15:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://waswatching.com/?p=15291#comment-217957</guid>
		<description>I dunno about the parity quest, since of those teams listed, several have made repeat appearances, and many of the teams are the &quot;usual suspects&quot; when it comes to playoff appearances.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="comment-toolbar" style="text-align: right"><input type="button" value="Reply" onclick="CF_Reply('Raf');" /><input type="button" value="Quote" onclick="CF_Quote('co_217957','Raf');" /></div><span id="co_217957"><p>I dunno about the parity quest, since of those teams listed, several have made repeat appearances, and many of the teams are the &#8220;usual suspects&#8221; when it comes to playoff appearances.</p>
</span>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

