Comments on: Week 22 – 2009 http://waswatching.com/2009/09/07/week-22-%e2%80%93-2009/ Holy Cow! We never take cannoli from a huckleberry. Sat, 26 May 2012 12:26:10 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Steve Lombardi http://waswatching.com/2009/09/07/week-22-%e2%80%93-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-230990 Steve Lombardi Wed, 09 Sep 2009 00:44:12 +0000 http://waswatching.com/?p=17246#comment-230990 It's coming. Hang in there. Be patient. It's coming...really.

It’s coming. Hang in there. Be patient. It’s coming…really.

]]> By: Evan3457 http://waswatching.com/2009/09/07/week-22-%e2%80%93-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-230987 Evan3457 Tue, 08 Sep 2009 22:59:44 +0000 http://waswatching.com/?p=17246#comment-230987 <b>Steve Lombardi</b> wrote: <blockquote>Yeah, I should ignore the facts and the stats. That would make me a great Yankees fan, right? </blockquote> Context. As in, what is the?

Steve Lombardi wrote:

Yeah, I should ignore the facts and the stats. That would make me a great Yankees fan, right?

Context. As in, what is the?

]]> By: JeremyM http://waswatching.com/2009/09/07/week-22-%e2%80%93-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-230709 JeremyM Mon, 07 Sep 2009 18:43:48 +0000 http://waswatching.com/?p=17246#comment-230709 Until you can show that record has anything to do with playoff performance or the performance for the rest of the season, then yes, I do think you should basically ignore it.

Until you can show that record has anything to do with playoff performance or the performance for the rest of the season, then yes, I do think you should basically ignore it.

]]> By: jeter96 http://waswatching.com/2009/09/07/week-22-%e2%80%93-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-230674 jeter96 Mon, 07 Sep 2009 17:29:49 +0000 http://waswatching.com/?p=17246#comment-230674 Dont ignore the stats but dont expect the team to be better than what any other Championship team has been. You make it seem like you wnat the team to have the same winning percentage against the good teams and the bad. But if they did, they would win 120 games and that just isnt possible.

Dont ignore the stats but dont expect the team to be better than what any other Championship team has been.

You make it seem like you wnat the team to have the same winning percentage against the good teams and the bad. But if they did, they would win 120 games and that just isnt possible.

]]> By: Steve Lombardi http://waswatching.com/2009/09/07/week-22-%e2%80%93-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-230563 Steve Lombardi Mon, 07 Sep 2009 14:55:19 +0000 http://waswatching.com/?p=17246#comment-230563 Yeah, I should ignore the facts and the stats. ;-) That would make me a great Yankees fan, right?

Yeah, I should ignore the facts and the stats. ;-) That would make me a great Yankees fan, right?

]]> By: JeremyM http://waswatching.com/2009/09/07/week-22-%e2%80%93-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-230557 JeremyM Mon, 07 Sep 2009 14:50:31 +0000 http://waswatching.com/?p=17246#comment-230557 Let it go, Steve. Let it go.

Let it go, Steve. Let it go.

]]> By: jeter96 http://waswatching.com/2009/09/07/week-22-%e2%80%93-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-230553 jeter96 Mon, 07 Sep 2009 14:47:00 +0000 http://waswatching.com/?p=17246#comment-230553 What is Bostons record against those teams? And the Angels also? Point making, good teams will always feast off of bad teams and then stay afloat against the good ones. Always has been that way and always will be that way.

What is Bostons record against those teams? And the Angels also?

Point making, good teams will always feast off of bad teams and then stay afloat against the good ones.
Always has been that way and always will be that way.

]]>