• Long Way Baby

    Posted by on October 1st, 2009 · Comments (15)

    Wasn’t it just like yesterday where the big crisis among many Yankees fans was the fact was that Chris Britton and/or Kevin Thompson were “stuck” at AAA – and the big league team wouldn’t call them up?

    It all seems silly now, eh?

    Post to Twitter

    Comments on Long Way Baby

    1. MJ
      October 1st, 2009 | 10:24 am

      Kevin Thompson came and went in the blink of an eye and I don’t remember much about him. Britton, however, pitched lights out for SWB over the ’07 and ’08 seasons and probably deserved a bit more than the cup of coffee the Yanks gave him.

      That being said, the system has enough bullpen arms that losing Britton isn’t the end of the world. From the looks of it, he must’ve been injured in 2009 because his performance indicates that something was very wrong.

    2. Corey
      October 1st, 2009 | 10:34 am

      I did like Chris Britton back in the day, can’t deny it.

    3. Corey
      October 1st, 2009 | 10:34 am

      And, can we give Cashman props for this?

    4. MJ
      October 1st, 2009 | 10:41 am

      @ Corey:
      I assume you mean props for the system having “enough bullpen arms that losing Britton isn’t the end of the world” right? In that case, I agree.

      Cashman still doesn’t know all that much about building a bullpen, as evidenced by the fact that he repeated the Farnsworth mistake (3Y/$17M from ’06-’08) with Marte (3Y/$12M). Again, not a colossal blunder in the grand scheme of things but certainly indicative of the larger point that Cashman hasn’t internalized the error.

    5. Corey
      October 1st, 2009 | 11:05 am

      MJ wrote:

      Cashman still doesn’t know all that much about building a bullpen, as evidenced by the fact that he repeated the Farnsworth mistake (3Y/$17M from ‘06-’08) with Marte (3Y/$12M).

      Ya know what though? The mistake with Marte isn’t as bad because he was just signed to be the LOOGY, with some innings during the 7th. Farnsworth was supposed to be our set up guy for 3 years.

    6. MJ
      October 1st, 2009 | 11:23 am

      Corey wrote:

      Ya know what though? The mistake with Marte isn’t as bad because he was just signed to be the LOOGY, with some innings during the 7th. Farnsworth was supposed to be our set up guy for 3 years.

      3Y/$12M for a LOOGY? Isn’t it worse to overspend for a role player than to overspend for a guy that you thought would play a central role in the closing out of wins?

      Cashman swinging and missing with Farnsworth was bad but, according to you, he not only made the same mistake twice, he made it with a guy that is only suppsed to get 1-2 outs max. UGH…that makes it even worse!

    7. Raf
      October 1st, 2009 | 11:25 am

      It wasn’t so much a crisis as the team not giving them a fair shake. At times it seemed that the organization was doing everything it could to bury Britton, for reasons I couldn’t quite understand. Put him out there and run him into the ground. Make him a long man, short man, whatever. At the time I thought between him and Albaladejo, they could replicate the performance of a LaTroy Hawkins.

      As for Thompson, I see him in the same vein as Shelly Duncan. Not sure why the Yanks didn’t even bother to call him up as a bench player.

      In any case, we’re talking about a couple of guys who are fringe ML’er, 24th, 25th man on the roster types.

    8. Raf
      October 1st, 2009 | 11:25 am

      @ Corey:
      Marte isn’t a LOOGY.

    9. Corey
      October 1st, 2009 | 11:40 am

      MJ wrote:

      3Y/$12M for a LOOGY? Isn’t it worse to overspend for a role player than to overspend for a guy that you thought would play a central role in the closing out of wins?

      I’m just saying it doesn’t sting as bad cause we don’t have to see him in crucial spots night after night.

      Raf wrote:

      @ Corey:
      Marte isn’t a LOOGY.

      No? That’s the role he’s been used in. for the most part, since he’s been here though.

    10. MJ
      October 1st, 2009 | 11:50 am

      Raf wrote:

      It wasn’t so much a crisis as the team not giving them a fair shake. At times it seemed that the organization was doing everything it could to bury Britton, for reasons I couldn’t quite understand. Put him out there and run him into the ground. Make him a long man, short man, whatever. At the time I thought between him and Albaladejo, they could replicate the performance of a LaTroy Hawkins.

      Agree completely.

    11. Raf
      October 1st, 2009 | 12:29 pm

      Corey wrote:

      #

      No? That’s the role he’s been used in. for the most part, since he’s been here though.

      I know. Marte can get lefties and righties out, and can toss multiple innings, which doesn’t make him a LOOGY in a traditional sense.

    12. MJ
      October 1st, 2009 | 12:45 pm

      Raf wrote:

      I know. Marte can get lefties and righties out, and can toss multiple innings, which doesn’t make him a LOOGY in a traditional sense.

      I assume by “get lefties and righties out” you’re speaking in the hypothetical? Thus far in New York, Marte hasn’t gotten much of anybody out.

    13. Raf
      October 1st, 2009 | 2:00 pm

      Regardless of his time in NY, I can’t ignore the other 400+ innings he has thrown in his career.

    14. MJ
      October 1st, 2009 | 2:09 pm

      @ Raf:
      Fair point, although what happened in the past doesn’t matter that much if he can’t produce the same results in the future. It becomes a conundrum of “WTF happened to the pitcher that used to get outs?”

    15. Corey
      October 1st, 2009 | 2:10 pm

      Raf wrote:

      Regardless of his time in NY, I can’t ignore the other 400+ innings he has thrown in his career.

      regardless of that, he was signed to be the LOOGY.

    Leave a reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.