Comments on: World Series Game Two Thread: Because [Your Name] Needs A Place For Their Stream Of Consciousness Ranting http://waswatching.com/2009/10/29/world-series-game-two-thread-because-your-name-needs-a-place-for-their-stream-of-consciousness-ranting/ Holy Cow! We never take cannoli from a huckleberry. Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:34:33 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: bballben711 http://waswatching.com/2009/10/29/world-series-game-two-thread-because-your-name-needs-a-place-for-their-stream-of-consciousness-ranting/comment-page-1/#comment-240313 bballben711 Fri, 30 Oct 2009 04:02:46 +0000 http://waswatching.com/?p=19091#comment-240313 About the Ryan Howard double play, why would Ryan Howard throw the ball to second if he supposedly caught it when he could have just stepped on the first base bag? I don't know why the umps didn't realize this.

About the Ryan Howard double play, why would Ryan Howard throw the ball to second if he supposedly caught it when he could have just stepped on the first base bag? I don’t know why the umps didn’t realize this.

]]> By: KPOcala http://waswatching.com/2009/10/29/world-series-game-two-thread-because-your-name-needs-a-place-for-their-stream-of-consciousness-ranting/comment-page-1/#comment-240305 KPOcala Fri, 30 Oct 2009 03:34:10 +0000 http://waswatching.com/?p=19091#comment-240305 Regarding the Phillie turned double play that wasn't (Ryan Howard not catching the ball on the fly). Why didn't the umpires look at the ball after the play to see if it was loaded with clay or not? P-Poor umpiring.... Also, I guess Mo's the only Yankee pitcher in the dugout, that will cost the Yanks dearly as the series goes on....

Regarding the Phillie turned double play that wasn’t (Ryan Howard not catching the ball on the fly). Why didn’t the umpires look at the ball after the play to see if it was loaded with clay or not? P-Poor umpiring…. Also, I guess Mo’s the only Yankee pitcher in the dugout, that will cost the Yanks dearly as the series goes on….

]]> By: g1ph7 http://waswatching.com/2009/10/29/world-series-game-two-thread-because-your-name-needs-a-place-for-their-stream-of-consciousness-ranting/comment-page-1/#comment-240304 g1ph7 Fri, 30 Oct 2009 03:17:04 +0000 http://waswatching.com/?p=19091#comment-240304 @ YankCrank Well, we're winning and considering what Steve said earlier (Boggs and Martinez sitting in 2003 WS) I think they're just fine with it ;)

@ YankCrank

Well, we’re winning and considering what Steve said earlier (Boggs and Martinez sitting in 2003 WS) I think they’re just fine with it ;)

]]> By: Steve Lombardi http://waswatching.com/2009/10/29/world-series-game-two-thread-because-your-name-needs-a-place-for-their-stream-of-consciousness-ranting/comment-page-1/#comment-240303 Steve Lombardi Fri, 30 Oct 2009 03:01:54 +0000 http://waswatching.com/?p=19091#comment-240303 Let's hope all that labor in the 8th doesn't come back to haunt Mo in the 9th...

Let’s hope all that labor in the 8th doesn’t come back to haunt Mo in the 9th…

]]> By: YankCrank http://waswatching.com/2009/10/29/world-series-game-two-thread-because-your-name-needs-a-place-for-their-stream-of-consciousness-ranting/comment-page-1/#comment-240294 YankCrank Fri, 30 Oct 2009 01:58:42 +0000 http://waswatching.com/?p=19091#comment-240294 This lineup decision is shit, our hitting outside of Jeter has been shit and we've officially let Pedro pitch into the 6th while giving up only 1 run. Do we want to win this series, or no?

This lineup decision is shit, our hitting outside of Jeter has been shit and we’ve officially let Pedro pitch into the 6th while giving up only 1 run.

Do we want to win this series, or no?

]]>