Comments on: Yanks Interested In Jermaine Dye? http://waswatching.com/2009/12/27/yanks-interested-in-jermaine-dye/ Holy Cow! We never take cannoli from a huckleberry. Sat, 26 May 2012 14:59:51 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Evan3457 http://waswatching.com/2009/12/27/yanks-interested-in-jermaine-dye/comment-page-1/#comment-247637 Evan3457 Wed, 30 Dec 2009 22:49:03 +0000 http://waswatching.com/?p=20233#comment-247637 Today's Poll: Criticizing Cashman based on rumor... A. Feature of <i>Was Watching</i> B. Bug of <i>Was Watching</i>

Today’s Poll:

Criticizing Cashman based on rumor…

A. Feature of Was Watching
B. Bug of Was Watching

]]> By: GDH http://waswatching.com/2009/12/27/yanks-interested-in-jermaine-dye/comment-page-1/#comment-247586 GDH Mon, 28 Dec 2009 19:06:02 +0000 http://waswatching.com/?p=20233#comment-247586 I'm reluctantly reserving judgement until they sign someone, and giving Cashman the benefit of the doubt that he's smarter than the rumor mongers. But it's getting more difficult, because I have the distinct feeling that we're about to get "rocked" on this deal. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5tIhwITwhSg I can understand not spending money but at least add something that's of value to the team. That plus Damon's sitting there and suddenly we've run out of shekels and don't have lunch money?

I’m reluctantly reserving judgement until they sign someone, and giving Cashman the benefit of the doubt that he’s smarter than the rumor mongers. But it’s getting more difficult, because I have the distinct feeling that we’re about to get “rocked” on this deal. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5tIhwITwhSg
I can understand not spending money but at least add something that’s of value to the team. That plus Damon’s sitting there and suddenly we’ve run out of shekels and don’t have lunch money?

]]> By: OldYanksFan http://waswatching.com/2009/12/27/yanks-interested-in-jermaine-dye/comment-page-1/#comment-247584 OldYanksFan Mon, 28 Dec 2009 17:01:37 +0000 http://waswatching.com/?p=20233#comment-247584 First off, I am AGAINST signing Dye. However, for something to chew on: Splits against LHP Career: .287 .366 .505 .871 2008::: .285 .354 .563 .917 2009::: .292 .387 .508 .894 He's an abortion in the field and on the basepaths, but he bat may play around .850 OPS. He is not a platoon for Gardner, but rather a PH'er in games they are behind late. He doesn't offer much else.

First off, I am AGAINST signing Dye.
However, for something to chew on:

Splits against LHP
Career: .287 .366 .505 .871
2008::: .285 .354 .563 .917
2009::: .292 .387 .508 .894

He’s an abortion in the field and on the basepaths, but he bat may play around .850 OPS. He is not a platoon for Gardner, but rather a PH’er in games they are behind late. He doesn’t offer much else.

]]> By: Jake1 http://waswatching.com/2009/12/27/yanks-interested-in-jermaine-dye/comment-page-1/#comment-247581 Jake1 Mon, 28 Dec 2009 14:01:28 +0000 http://waswatching.com/?p=20233#comment-247581 the only real lf option is still a fa. his name is damon

the only real lf option is still a fa. his name is damon

]]> By: Raf http://waswatching.com/2009/12/27/yanks-interested-in-jermaine-dye/comment-page-1/#comment-247579 Raf Mon, 28 Dec 2009 13:31:57 +0000 http://waswatching.com/?p=20233#comment-247579 I don't see it. The only reason he would be signed is to platoon with Gardner, and even that really doesn't make sense as there are better options.

I don’t see it. The only reason he would be signed is to platoon with Gardner, and even that really doesn’t make sense as there are better options.

]]> By: Corey http://waswatching.com/2009/12/27/yanks-interested-in-jermaine-dye/comment-page-1/#comment-247578 Corey Mon, 28 Dec 2009 07:37:30 +0000 http://waswatching.com/?p=20233#comment-247578 Love the links to old posts with old comments that proved to be a good way of thinking. I still think we should pass on Dye.

Love the links to old posts with old comments that proved to be a good way of thinking. I still think we should pass on Dye.

]]> By: MJ http://waswatching.com/2009/12/27/yanks-interested-in-jermaine-dye/comment-page-1/#comment-247577 MJ Mon, 28 Dec 2009 03:51:07 +0000 http://waswatching.com/?p=20233#comment-247577 Flat out, unequivocally: if Cashman signs Dye, he may as well resign. I won't defend a GM that signs Jermaine Dye under any circumstance. Nick Johnson was bad enough. This would be totally idiotic. I can't believe the Yanks think Johnny Damon is so unaffordable that they'd take this old, slow, defensively-challenged piece of complete garbage. Revolting and distressing.

Flat out, unequivocally: if Cashman signs Dye, he may as well resign. I won’t defend a GM that signs Jermaine Dye under any circumstance. Nick Johnson was bad enough. This would be totally idiotic.

I can’t believe the Yanks think Johnny Damon is so unaffordable that they’d take this old, slow, defensively-challenged piece of complete garbage.

Revolting and distressing.

]]>