• Yanks Exec: Cashman Still In Charge, Despite Soriano Signing

    Posted by on January 17th, 2011 · Comments (4)

    More skinny on the whole Cashman/Soriano thing, via Wallace Matthews -

    The Yankees have “full confidence” in general manager Brian Cashman, according to a senior team executive who acknowledged a division in the ranks over the signing last week of reliever Rafael Soriano but characterized the incident as “a disagreement, not a dispute.”

    “Cash did not want to give up the [No. 1] draft pick,” said the executive, who refused to speak on the record until the Soriano deal is finalized pending a physical this week. “But at the end of the day, he didn’t throw his body across the tracks over it, he just disagreed with it. It was a good faith dispute. Reasonable people can disagree.”

    The executive went on to say: “Cash has not lost one iota of credibility or autonomy over this. There has been no loss of faith in him at all. Cash is in charge of all baseball operations, but he would never in a million years tell you ownership doesn’t make the final decisions. It’s their money, not his.”

    Cashman has not returned phone calls or text messages since the story broke last Thursday that Soriano and the Yankees had come to terms on a three-year deal potentially worth $35 million, but with player-triggered opt-out clauses after each of the first two seasons.

    But the source said that while Cashman remained opposed to signing Soriano, co-owners Hal and Hank Steinbrenner, along with team president Randy Levine –who is said to have come up with the complex and unorthodox deal Soriano and his agent Scott Boras eventually agreed to — made the final decision to bring the right-hander, who led the American League with 45 saves for the Rays last year, to the Bronx.

    “The thinking was that with Andy [Pettitte] maybe not coming back, and the starting rotation that we have, and knowing Mo [Rivera] is 41, this was a good deal to make,” the source said. “The price on Soriano was falling and it just seemed to all of us that to get a player of this magnitude at this price was too good to pass up.”

    The executive said Cashman’s main objection was with surrendering the draft pick, not Soriano’s reputed behavioral problems.

    “He’s a hothead, that’s all” said one source who knows Soriano, “but he’s matured and as long as he’s around the right people, he’ll be all right.”

    The Yankee executive downplayed any type of a rift within the organization to rival the schism that infuriated Cashman about five years ago, when a cabal of Yankees front-office men based in Tampa, a group that was led by owner George Steinbrenner and included roving pitching instructor Billy Connors, scouts Mark Newman and Damon Oppenheimer, operated like a shadow government and often overruled Cashman’s decisions.

    “This is nothing like that,” the executive said. “They were running their own operation and weren’t reporting to Cashman. There’s nothing like that going on now. Cashman is still in charge of the baseball operation here.”

    I think I get it. Cashman is “in charge.” And, he has “autonomy.” But, the Brothers Steinbrenner and Randy Levine can still do whatever they want and Cashman has to sit there while it happens and say “Thank you, sir. May I have another?” Yeah, it’s no wonder Cash why hasn’t returned phone calls or text messages since last Thursday…maybe his buttocks are still too sore for him to be able to respond to inquiries on this one?

    Comments on Yanks Exec: Cashman Still In Charge, Despite Soriano Signing

    1. Raf
      January 18th, 2011 | 12:18 am

      “The price on Soriano was falling and it just seemed to all of us that to get a player of this magnitude at this price was too good to pass up.”

      Talk about a *facepalm* comment.

      If the contract that Soriano signed was an indicator of a falling price, I’d hate to see what his original demands were. :D

    2. BOHAN
      January 18th, 2011 | 1:54 am

      Isn’t it like that in any company or organization??? one person might be put in charge of a project but if the bosses want to go another way or have a different vision they have all the power to do that???

    3. LMJ229
      January 18th, 2011 | 1:03 pm

      BOHAN wrote:

      Isn’t it like that in any company or organization??? one person might be put in charge of a project but if the bosses want to go another way or have a different vision they have all the power to do that???

      Exactly! Cashman is not the owner so he does not possess the ultimate authority. I’m sure he still has to run every deal by the owners, just like any other GM. The fact is, the owners have the ultimate authority, it is their team and their money, so they do have the right to dictate the direction of the team. Now, whether or not you like that type of meddling is a completely different subject.

    4. MJ Recanati
      January 18th, 2011 | 1:10 pm

      I actually don’t buy a word of this. They overruled Cashman so any notion that they still have confidence in him is rubbish. They clearly don’t have confidence in him, otherwise they’d have let him make the decision to pass on an overpriced middle reliever.

      It’s an absurd turn of events considering that the chief meddler — the Boss — lost his marbles about six years ago and kicked the bucket last summer. It’s unfortunate that the Yankees are back to a place where they won’t let the head of baseball opertaions do his job.

    Leave a reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.