Playing The Rice Card
Posted by Steve L. on December 22nd, 2011 · Comments (7)
Here’s two guys who should:
| Rk | Player | WAR/pos | PA | From | To | Age | G | R | H | 2B | 3B | HR | RBI | SB | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bernie Williams | 47.3 | 9053 | 1991 | 2006 | 22-37 | 2076 | 1366 | 2336 | 449 | 55 | 287 | 1257 | 147 | .297 | .381 | .477 |
| 2 | Dale Murphy | 44.2 | 9040 | 1976 | 1993 | 20-37 | 2180 | 1197 | 2111 | 350 | 39 | 398 | 1266 | 161 | .265 | .346 | .469 |
| 3 | Jim Rice | 41.5 | 9058 | 1974 | 1989 | 21-36 | 2089 | 1249 | 2452 | 373 | 79 | 382 | 1451 | 58 | .298 | .352 | .502 |
.
Cooperstown, take note.





Wow! The numbers speak for themselves.
The numbers are not what they seem; Bernie played in an ERA in which there was much more scoring than Rice’s era or Murphy’s. Bernie’s close, but I don’t think he’s a Hall of Famer.
But then, I don’t think Murphy is, either, and Rice is very marginal.
I adore Bernie, but it’s not the Hall of Least Common Denominator…
@ Evan3457:
Agreed.
Good work on the title, I LOL’ed
Rice had a .789 on the Road and .920 in Boston. He was a product of Fenway Park.
OldYanksFan wrote:
Part of what I was thinking when I said he was very marginal.