The Yankees Are Just A .500 Team After Their First 42 Games Of 2012
Posted by Steve L. on May 21st, 2012 · Comments (17)
Here’s what their record was after their first 42 games in the twenty five years prior to this season:
| Rk | Tm | Year 6 | W | L | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | NYY | 2011 | 23 | 19 | Ind. Games | .548 |
| 3 | NYY | 2010 | 26 | 16 | Ind. Games | .619 |
| 4 | NYY | 2009 | 24 | 18 | Ind. Games | .571 |
| 5 | NYY | 2008 | 20 | 22 | Ind. Games | .476 |
| 6 | NYY | 2007 | 19 | 23 | Ind. Games | .452 |
| 7 | NYY | 2006 | 24 | 18 | Ind. Games | .571 |
| 8 | NYY | 2005 | 22 | 20 | Ind. Games | .524 |
| 9 | NYY | 2004 | 24 | 18 | Ind. Games | .571 |
| 10 | NYY | 2003 | 27 | 15 | Ind. Games | .643 |
| 11 | NYY | 2002 | 27 | 15 | Ind. Games | .643 |
| 12 | NYY | 2001 | 23 | 19 | Ind. Games | .548 |
| 13 | NYY | 2000 | 25 | 17 | Ind. Games | .595 |
| 14 | NYY | 1999 | 24 | 18 | Ind. Games | .571 |
| 15 | NYY | 1998 | 32 | 10 | Ind. Games | .762 |
| 16 | NYY | 1997 | 25 | 17 | Ind. Games | .595 |
| 17 | NYY | 1996 | 25 | 17 | Ind. Games | .595 |
| 18 | NYY | 1995 | 17 | 25 | Ind. Games | .405 |
| 19 | NYY | 1994 | 29 | 13 | Ind. Games | .690 |
| 20 | NYY | 1993 | 24 | 18 | Ind. Games | .571 |
| 21 | NYY | 1992 | 23 | 19 | Ind. Games | .548 |
| 22 | NYY | 1991 | 18 | 24 | Ind. Games | .429 |
| 23 | NYY | 1990 | 17 | 25 | Ind. Games | .405 |
| 24 | NYY | 1989 | 20 | 22 | Ind. Games | .476 |
| 25 | NYY | 1988 | 28 | 14 | Ind. Games | .667 |
| 26 | NYY | 1987 | 27 | 15 | Ind. Games | .643 |
.
There’s a good chance that the Yankees will win less than 90 games this season…if you go by the feel of their season so far. Just like they did in 2008.





Ok. I’ll say it: the Girardi watch begins now.
Maybe what this team really needs is The Boss. What would he be doing now?
ken wrote:
Yup. There is no accountability in Yankeeland any more. Granted, the Boss was a knee jerk reaction guy, and that was not always good for the team. But, clearly, he was felt and applied some heat. That doesn’t exist in Yankeeland anymore. Today, it’s “the numbers will be there at the end of the year, yadda, yadda….”
If Big Stein were around and sound today, Tex, A-Rod, Girardi, Long and a few others would be in the crosshairs right now.
ken wrote:
Scratching away at the inside of his coffin?
Steve L. wrote:
It hurt more than it helped. The Yankees win a lot more in the 80′s and don’t collapse towards the end of the 80′s had Steinbrenner listened to his baseball people and just stuck to building ships or the Yankee empire.
ken wrote:
Because The Boss did the Yankees so much good with his absurd, illogical behavior over the years.
Steve L. wrote:
To what end? Simply trashing a guy in the papers achieves nothing. Accountability isn’t just telling a group of reporters how much someone sucks.
My fav, Thurman Munson, once said: “Don’t measure me by my methods. Measure me by my results.”
And, when he had his marbles, from 1973 to 2003, Steinbrenner’s Yankees won the WS in 1977, 1978, 1996, 1998, 1999 and 2000. And, they made the WS in 1976, 1981, 2001 and 2003. When you look at the results, Big Stein has the pelts on his belt.
You cannot say that about the post-2003 Yankees. They have one pelt.
Steve L. wrote:
1973-2003 = 6/31 = 17.6%
2003-2011 = 1/9 = 11.1%
Not that different after all.
Corey Italiano wrote:
Especially when you consider how many more rounds of playoffs there are now vs. the pre-95 era.
@ Corey Italiano:
Use pennants instead of rings and then what are the %?
@ Steve L.:
In previous debates we’ve used championships as the metric to judge Cashmans performance.
Since there are far more rounds in the playoffs today than in the pre-95 era, it’s an impossible comparison.
Would you prefer % of playoff berths?
Corey Italiano wrote:
Exactly right.
Steve L. wrote:
So Steinbrenner’s money doesn’t factor in here. It was merely his passion and desire to win and his willingness to behave like an absolute insane degenerate prick that helped the team gain all those “pelts”?
I’ll remember that the next time you talk about the Steinbrenner checkbook.
How many times, when Stein was in charge, did his team have the same gap in payroll between them and the 2nd highest team as they do now?
In fact, there were some years where the Yankees won and they did not lead the league in payroll, IIRC.
The gap between the Yankees now, and everyone else, is obscene.
It’s apples and oranges – then and now
@ Steve L.:
You can tell us it’s apples and oranges but that doesn’t change the fact that it wasn’t Steinbrenner’s behavior disorder that caused the team to spring for Goose Gossage, Catfish Hunter, Reggie Jackson, Ed Whitson, Dave Winfield, David Wells, Roger Clemens, David Cone, etc. It was his money.
There is absolutely no evidence — not a shred — to suggest that Steinbrenner’s temper tantrums positively contributed to the New York Yankees from 1973-2003. After all, that was what your comment at 6:57 am this morning suggested. That this team lacks an owner with the requisite anger management issues to shake them into a winning streak. As if.
Steve L. wrote:
It’s really not as bad as you would think, % wise. in the mid aughts it was insane. The league is catching up, however.
Steve L. wrote:
What was the salary structure then and now?
Steve L. wrote:
If it means having Jeter, Posada, Mo, & Bernie lasting their entire career with the Yankees, so be it. You could’ve added Pettitte to that list too, had there not been so much concern over his elbow.