• 105-Game Suspension For Miguel Tejada

    Posted by on August 17th, 2013 · Comments (19)

    Yup.

    Is it just me, or, are the majority of guys who get busted for PEDs Hispanic?

    Comments on 105-Game Suspension For Miguel Tejada

    1. KPOcala
      August 17th, 2013 | 3:47 pm

      I grew up in Miami, spent my first 45 years there. The ease that people are able to acquire steroids, well you’d call me a liar. All I can say is that I started lifting in the ’70′s, and ‘roid use was, and had been rampant. “Somebody” sure as hell had a pipeline out of the country……

    2. Sweet Lou
      August 17th, 2013 | 4:02 pm

      Steve L. wrote:

      Is it just me, or, are the majority of guys who get busted for PEDs Hispanic?

      It’s not you. Someone pointed that out the same thing to me recently, so apparently you’re not the only person to make the same observation.

    3. Corey
      August 17th, 2013 | 4:48 pm

      It’s just you. There’s plenty of people of all races and creeds on PEDs.

    4. August 17th, 2013 | 5:21 pm

      Corey wrote:

      It’s just you. There’s plenty of people of all races and creeds on PEDs.

      I said “busted” – meaning they, mostly, are the guys who get caught by MLB. Sure, many others may be using. There’s a difference between doing and getting caught.

    5. Kamieniecki
      August 17th, 2013 | 6:13 pm

      Corey wrote:

      It’s just you. There’s plenty of people of all races and creeds on PEDs.

      The fallacy of defective induction was not committed here…
      @ Evan3457:

    6. Evan3457
      August 17th, 2013 | 9:29 pm

      Kamieniecki wrote:

      Corey wrote:
      It’s just you. There’s plenty of people of all races and creeds on PEDs.
      The fallacy of defective induction was not committed here…
      @ Evan3457:

      I have no idea what you’re talking to me for.

      If you’re just trying to bait me, don’t worry, I regard you as a master baiter.

    7. Kamieniecki
      August 18th, 2013 | 7:15 am

      Evan3457 wrote:

      I have no idea what you’re talking to me for.

      @ Kamieniecki:
      It was an “appeal to authority” in support of an argument that the fallacy of defective induction was not committed by a commenter.

    8. Evan3457
      August 18th, 2013 | 12:17 pm

      Kamieniecki wrote:

      Evan3457 wrote:
      I have no idea what you’re talking to me for.
      @ Kamieniecki:
      It was an “appeal to authority” in support of an argument that the fallacy of defective induction was not committed by a commenter.

      Still has nothing to do with me.

    9. Mr. October
      August 18th, 2013 | 12:30 pm

      Evan3457 wrote:

      I regard you as a master baiter.

      Ad hominem (argumentum ad hominem); and reasoning from the results.

      Brian Cashman’s I.Q. was measured at 90.
      Therefore, all M.L.B. G.M.s are of borderline dullness/average intelligence in tested mental age to chronological age ratio.

    10. Evan3457
      August 18th, 2013 | 2:04 pm

      Mr. October wrote:

      Evan3457 wrote:
      I regard you as a master baiter.
      Ad hominem (argumentum ad hominem); and reasoning from the results.
      Brian Cashman’s I.Q. was measured at 90.
      Therefore, all M.L.B. G.M.s are of borderline dullness/average intelligence in tested mental age to chronological age ratio.

      I wasn’t making an argument there. But blather away.

    11. Ricketson
      August 18th, 2013 | 8:47 pm

      Evan3457 wrote:

      I wasn’t making an argument there.

      It’s hard to tell sometimes…

    12. Evan3457
      August 18th, 2013 | 11:53 pm

      Ricketson wrote:

      Evan3457 wrote:
      I wasn’t making an argument there.
      It’s hard to tell sometimes…

      Really?

    13. Ricketson
      August 19th, 2013 | 1:16 pm

      Evan3457 wrote:

      I wasn’t making an argument there.

      Ricketson wrote:

      It’s hard to tell sometimes…

      Evan3457 wrote:

      Really?

      @ Evan3457:

      Yeah, really:
      Evan3457 wrote:

      Well, that’s part of my point. There are some random elements in any sports contest. They’re tests of skill, but there’s also good luck and bad luck. That means the better team doesn’t always win, but it also means the team that wins is the winner…

    14. Evan3457
      August 19th, 2013 | 2:33 pm

      Ricketson wrote:

      Evan3457 wrote:
      Well, that’s part of my point. There are some random elements in any sports contest. They’re tests of skill, but there’s also good luck and bad luck. That means the better team doesn’t always win, but it also means the team that wins is the winner…

      Yes, that was well written.

      What that has to do with this thread, I have no idea.

    15. #15
      August 19th, 2013 | 5:36 pm

      I appears you guys must be taking a wide range of medications and seeing several different types of doctors at the same time.

    16. McMillan
      August 20th, 2013 | 11:57 pm

      Corey wrote:

      There’s plenty of people of all races and creeds on PEDs.

      @ Corey:
      Some races and creeds more so than others…
      @ MJ Recanati:

      Evan3457 wrote:

      Well, that’s part of my point. There are some random elements in any sports contest. They’re tests of skill, but there’s also good luck and bad luck. That means the better team doesn’t always win, but it also means the team that wins is the winner…

      Great point. Who helped you with it?

    17. Mr. October
      August 21st, 2013 | 12:39 am

      McMillan wrote:

      Great point. Who helped you with it?

      Evan042013 (0-for-2013) must have performed some kind of Vulcan mind meld with Recanati to work that one out.

    18. Evan3457
      August 21st, 2013 | 2:23 am

      McMillan wrote:

      Corey wrote:
      There’s plenty of people of all races and creeds on PEDs.
      @ Corey:
      Some races and creeds more so than others…
      @ MJ Recanati:
      Evan3457 wrote:
      Well, that’s part of my point. There are some random elements in any sports contest. They’re tests of skill, but there’s also good luck and bad luck. That means the better team doesn’t always win, but it also means the team that wins is the winner…
      Great point. Who helped you with it?

      Certainly wasn’t you.

    19. Evan3457
      August 21st, 2013 | 2:24 am

      Mr. October wrote:

      McMillan wrote:
      Great point. Who helped you with it?
      Evan042013 (0-for-2013) must have performed some kind of Vulcan mind meld with Recanati to work that one out.

      Most people can see the obvious. Not you, of course.

    Leave a reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.